Now, I may not PAY that price, because I'm a college student, but those prices are FAIR.
The thing is, even if you look at it as art, it's also still a game. No matter how pretty/masterful/whatever it is, by the 15th time you've played Baldur's Gate 1, it does start to get a little tiresome. You're not going to pay 30 bucks for that 16th time. Even the most engaging and dynamic open game will EVENTUALLY get played out in full, often multiple times. That's the whole reason people buy new games! They want something NEW and unpredictable. Something where you don't know the answers to the puzzles, you haven't memorized all the sniper points and you don't know all the right decisions to make already.
There is DEFINITELY a price for nostalgia and paying your due to a "classic" masterful game. But people just aren't going to pay very much for something they already know. There is certainly a group of people buying old games who haven't played them already, but I get the feeling that those actually going out and buying said old games are the minority.
Hmm, what is the point of buying a game you've already played before? Lost your original copy? The old titles I've purchased (only about 3) were all games I just never got around to playing before.
What is the value of an old game?
03/08/2011 04:41:26 PM
- 590 Views
Depends on the game.
03/08/2011 06:15:04 PM
- 453 Views
I agree on 5-10, depending
04/08/2011 05:22:36 PM
- 454 Views
Re: I agree on 5-10, depending
05/08/2011 04:43:30 AM
- 581 Views
I bought Arch Rivals (NES) for $2.50 a few months ago. I'd say that's fair.
04/08/2011 08:44:58 PM
- 442 Views