Ah hah! I found the essay I wanted to post. Very interesting- "What Went Wrong With Civ 5"
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 06/06/2011 12:06:56 AM
I can't repost it here, mostly because there are a bunch of screenshots the author uses to support his points.
It's a bit long, but very much worth the read. Among other things he points out how the global happiness system does the opposite of what it intended, the ever-present penalties on everything from roads to cities, the diplomacy system, and the One Unit Per Tile system.
When I first tried it, I loved the 1UPT system. It felt fresh and interesting. After playing around with it though, and then going back and playing Civ4, it just... didn't seem fun. The article really devastates the 1UPT system, arguing that it is the fundamental cause of all of Civ 5's flaws.
Essentially, 1UPT means that people can't have large armies, because otherwise things would get clogged. The way you force smaller armies is to make things more expensive to produce. But then that means small cities would have nothing to do in the first third of the game, so they had to be buffed. And so on.
But I'm starting to ramble, go read it!
It's a bit long, but very much worth the read. Among other things he points out how the global happiness system does the opposite of what it intended, the ever-present penalties on everything from roads to cities, the diplomacy system, and the One Unit Per Tile system.
When I first tried it, I loved the 1UPT system. It felt fresh and interesting. After playing around with it though, and then going back and playing Civ4, it just... didn't seem fun. The article really devastates the 1UPT system, arguing that it is the fundamental cause of all of Civ 5's flaws.
Essentially, 1UPT means that people can't have large armies, because otherwise things would get clogged. The way you force smaller armies is to make things more expensive to produce. But then that means small cities would have nothing to do in the first third of the game, so they had to be buffed. And so on.
But I'm starting to ramble, go read it!
I amuse myself.
Civ 5: It's the best.
05/06/2011 05:07:25 AM
- 890 Views
I've played the past two, and loved them for about. . .two hours each.
05/06/2011 07:34:10 AM
- 584 Views
Exactly this. If a game doesn't have multiplayer, I need it to have story. *NM*
05/06/2011 08:57:24 AM
- 299 Views
I have... mixed feelings about it.
05/06/2011 07:45:49 AM
- 617 Views
The punishment system is why I don't play it any longer. *NM*
05/06/2011 09:36:20 PM
- 261 Views
Ah hah! I found the essay I wanted to post. Very interesting- "What Went Wrong With Civ 5"
06/06/2011 12:06:56 AM
- 739 Views
Hmm yeah I got about a third of the way through that.
06/06/2011 01:13:12 AM
- 688 Views
He's definitely a top-tier player. Beta tested Civ4, as I understand it
06/06/2011 03:16:45 AM
- 585 Views
to all: which is the best (or your favourite) civ?
06/06/2011 10:13:00 AM
- 573 Views
4
06/06/2011 04:48:25 PM
- 629 Views
Yeah... 4 is my favorite. Plus it has a bunch of expansions and patches *NM*
06/06/2011 05:23:10 PM
- 268 Views
4 is a great game
06/06/2011 07:10:36 PM
- 707 Views
Eh, I mostly just wasn't a fan of espionage's mechanics. I don't think it really changed much, tho
06/06/2011 10:13:25 PM
- 576 Views
if i buy it 2nd hand (£20 saving) do i have to worry about online registration
07/06/2011 10:48:57 AM
- 557 Views