The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card
1) Something that is cheap for ATI to make
2) Cheap enough to be put in OEM boxes such as HP, Gateway, Dell, etc
3) Has thermals (tdp) low enough you can put it in a laptop
The HD5670 has almost the same performance (it is slightly slower) than the performance card of 3 years ago known as the 8800gt/9800gt
------------------------
For more performance consider these cards
HD4870 and the HD5770 these cards about twice the performance as your card. The HD4870 generates a little more heat and doesn't have directx 11, but very few games have directx 11 features and no game out there needs directx 11 yet (and there won't be any major game that needs directx 11 anytime soon for the xbox 360 and ps3 are based off older hardware and if they want to port the game to consoles and pc they will require direct x 9)
The HD6850/HD6870 and GTX 460 (even the 768 mb version) is about 3 times faster than your HD5670
The HD4870/HD5770 is the performance card of last year. The HD6850/HD6870 and GTX 460 768 and GTX 460 1024 are the performance cards of this year. How the graphic cards work is there are sorta four main catergories
Functional (barely better than an integrated graphics)
Casual Game
Performance Gamer
Enthusiast Gamer
You almost always get the best bang for your buck if you buy in the performance gamer area. The Enthusiast Gamer has a lot of mark up and the companies make a lot of profit. The Casual Gamer is designed to be good enough to play, but not what you really want to play. The casual gamer cards are where ati and nvidia make there most money for usually they are half the cost to make than the performance gamer parts, have a good mark up, and they sell the cards by the boatloads.
------------------------
Sorry I don't have time to write more (or to look for links comparing card x and y), I need to go to work, literally selling the same video cards you been asking about.
1) Something that is cheap for ATI to make
2) Cheap enough to be put in OEM boxes such as HP, Gateway, Dell, etc
3) Has thermals (tdp) low enough you can put it in a laptop
The HD5670 has almost the same performance (it is slightly slower) than the performance card of 3 years ago known as the 8800gt/9800gt
------------------------
For more performance consider these cards
HD4870 and the HD5770 these cards about twice the performance as your card. The HD4870 generates a little more heat and doesn't have directx 11, but very few games have directx 11 features and no game out there needs directx 11 yet (and there won't be any major game that needs directx 11 anytime soon for the xbox 360 and ps3 are based off older hardware and if they want to port the game to consoles and pc they will require direct x 9)
The HD6850/HD6870 and GTX 460 (even the 768 mb version) is about 3 times faster than your HD5670
The HD4870/HD5770 is the performance card of last year. The HD6850/HD6870 and GTX 460 768 and GTX 460 1024 are the performance cards of this year. How the graphic cards work is there are sorta four main catergories
Functional (barely better than an integrated graphics)
Casual Game
Performance Gamer
Enthusiast Gamer
You almost always get the best bang for your buck if you buy in the performance gamer area. The Enthusiast Gamer has a lot of mark up and the companies make a lot of profit. The Casual Gamer is designed to be good enough to play, but not what you really want to play. The casual gamer cards are where ati and nvidia make there most money for usually they are half the cost to make than the performance gamer parts, have a good mark up, and they sell the cards by the boatloads.
------------------------
Sorry I don't have time to write more (or to look for links comparing card x and y), I need to go to work, literally selling the same video cards you been asking about.
In need of graphics card advice. (edit with update)
29/10/2010 04:01:37 PM
- 593 Views
That's the card in my new iMac. Well, according to Apple, at least...
29/10/2010 04:45:19 PM
- 470 Views
A 9800GT is roughly equivalent to a 5670. *NM*
29/10/2010 04:58:07 PM
- 226 Views
I've no problem deferring to someone more familiar w/ recent cards.
29/10/2010 05:44:20 PM
- 374 Views
Your card isn't an ati hd5670, it is about 75% as fast as an 8800gt
01/11/2010 01:34:47 AM
- 467 Views
ATI Mobility HD5730 is almost the same as the desktop ATI HD5670 but it is closer to ATI HD5570
01/11/2010 01:32:01 AM
- 894 Views
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at.
29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM
- 336 Views
System specs:
29/10/2010 05:39:19 PM
- 331 Views
Glad to hear it's working. That kind of performance is much more what I'd expect from a 5670. *NM*
31/10/2010 01:45:45 AM
- 149 Views
That didn't stop me from getting the 5770 so that I would have a "buffer zone" of peformance gains
31/10/2010 01:11:35 PM
- 370 Views
The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card
31/10/2010 02:23:45 PM
- 400 Views
Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about.
01/11/2010 01:42:31 PM
- 330 Views
Re: Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about.
01/11/2010 09:29:38 PM
- 391 Views
If you do return the card, these are the cards I would recommend (links inside to newegg)
01/11/2010 02:32:23 AM
- 372 Views
Excellent post
01/11/2010 05:06:10 PM
- 518 Views
And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat
02/11/2010 03:14:10 AM
- 317 Views
Re: And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat
02/11/2010 12:52:46 PM
- 353 Views
Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card
02/11/2010 06:14:16 PM
- 440 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card
02/11/2010 09:19:44 PM
- 494 Views
Do you already have a computer or are you building a new one? If so what are the specs? And ....
03/11/2010 10:49:35 AM
- 331 Views
Well
03/11/2010 08:31:11 PM
- 505 Views
If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer
04/11/2010 12:28:44 AM
- 474 Views
Slickdeals thread claims it's no longer available. Was a good deal, though. *NM*
04/11/2010 01:28:09 PM
- 154 Views
Re: If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer
04/11/2010 06:02:57 PM
- 334 Views