Active Users:999 Time:13/11/2024 06:36:26 AM
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. Aemon Send a noteboard - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM
If you're running 1680 x 1050, your 5670 should be able to run most games (including Cataclysm) on very high settings. Without testing it I don't know what "Ultra" entails, but you should be able to run near the top of the settings spectrum. This is assuming that you have a decent processor and enough RAM, obviously. If you can't, something is probably wrong. Definitely update the drivers; you should see noticeable improvements, but don't expect night and day.

If you're trying to run 1920 x 1200, you'll only be able to run most games on low details. If this is the resolution you're using, then your results sound pretty standard to me, and you shouldn't expect to improve much no matter what you try. I would recommend against trying to overclock the card if you don't know what you're doing, and can't easily afford a replacement.

If I were you, I'd update your drivers, and see what you think. If you're not happy with the results, or if you're determined to game at 1920, return your card, and buy a 5770. This should set you back about $150, and, in my opinion, is probably the best bang-for-your-buck card out there in the 1920 arena.

Good luck. :)
Reply to message
In need of graphics card advice. (edit with update) - 29/10/2010 04:01:37 PM 593 Views
That's the card in my new iMac. Well, according to Apple, at least... - 29/10/2010 04:45:19 PM 470 Views
A 9800GT is roughly equivalent to a 5670. *NM* - 29/10/2010 04:58:07 PM 227 Views
I've no problem deferring to someone more familiar w/ recent cards. - 29/10/2010 05:44:20 PM 374 Views
Each architecture is different and better at different things. - 29/10/2010 08:16:14 PM 329 Views
Your card isn't an ati hd5670, it is about 75% as fast as an 8800gt - 01/11/2010 01:34:47 AM 467 Views
Good to know. - 01/11/2010 01:45:15 PM 322 Views
One thing you didn't mention is what resolution you're trying to run at. - 29/10/2010 05:07:38 PM 337 Views
System specs: - 29/10/2010 05:39:19 PM 331 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 08:22:38 PM 340 Views
Re: System specs: - 29/10/2010 09:30:24 PM 310 Views
I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:22:20 PM 396 Views
Re: I was looking at this card as well for a new system build - 29/10/2010 06:35:30 PM 395 Views
Thanks for the update! This makes my choice easy *NM* - 31/10/2010 02:56:38 AM 175 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 31/10/2010 01:12:00 PM 152 Views
The HD5670 is meant to be a casual gamer card - 31/10/2010 02:23:45 PM 400 Views
Nice to know that someone selling these actually knows what they're talking about. - 01/11/2010 01:42:31 PM 330 Views
Fry's Electronics *NM* - 01/11/2010 01:45:23 PM 159 Views
If you do return the card, these are the cards I would recommend (links inside to newegg) - 01/11/2010 02:32:23 AM 372 Views
Excellent post - 01/11/2010 05:06:10 PM 518 Views
The 460 is a better card than a 465 - 02/11/2010 03:11:10 AM 306 Views
And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 03:14:10 AM 318 Views
Re: And FPS per dollar isn't the only important stat - 02/11/2010 12:52:46 PM 354 Views
Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 06:14:16 PM 440 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 08:01:21 PM 320 Views
Re: Don't get me wrong, I agree the HD5770 is an awesome card - 02/11/2010 09:19:44 PM 494 Views
Do you already have a computer or are you building a new one? If so what are the specs? And .... - 03/11/2010 10:49:35 AM 331 Views
Well - 03/11/2010 08:31:11 PM 505 Views
Sorry I remember now - 03/11/2010 11:41:14 PM 357 Views
Re: Sorry I remember now - 04/11/2010 05:45:22 PM 501 Views
If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 12:28:44 AM 474 Views
Re: If you are not going to overclock, you should really consider this computer - 04/11/2010 06:02:57 PM 335 Views
HP doesn't use homemade harddrives - 04/11/2010 07:41:35 PM 352 Views

Reply to Message