It means that WoW is 6 years newer than Baldur's Gate, and 6 years OLDER than a newly released modern game. Can you see where I'm going with this? If WoW has 6 years of improvement over Baldur's Gate, and a modern game has 6 years of improvement over WoW, then WoW is as inferior to a modern game as Baldur's Gate is to WoW.
From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
From a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, whether you measure that in texture detail, polygon count, minimum system requirements, or whatever, WoW is at least an order of magnitude below modern standards.
For instance, I currently have a rather low-end system which, for various reasons, I will not be upgrading any time soon.
Due to the aforementioned inclusive policy they use to maximize their player base, WoW runs fine on my computer.
I thought Dragon Age looked neat and wanted to try it. Regrettably, it was not compatible with my archaic video card, and the game was unplayable.
Now, I consider graphics that I can see on my computer to be superior to graphics that I cannot see on my computer. Therefore, from a TECHNICAL STANDPOINT, WoW has better graphics than Dragon Age: Origins.
For me anyway.
So...how long before we can play WOW on our phones?
11/09/2010 06:25:28 AM
- 885 Views
Given how crappy the graphics are, I'd say it's a data issue.
11/09/2010 09:19:04 AM
- 721 Views
the wow graphics are far from bad
12/09/2010 06:12:15 AM
- 611 Views
"Bad" is subjective. By any modern technical standard, however, they are inferior.
12/09/2010 07:28:34 AM
- 696 Views
They're definitely antiquated, but from a business sense, doing so makes a ton of sense
12/09/2010 09:03:36 AM
- 790 Views
Oh I understand.
12/09/2010 05:02:26 PM
- 613 Views
they really aren't bad
12/09/2010 06:11:48 PM
- 597 Views
You guys are not actually disagreeing. Aemon realizes this, but I'm not sure LL does
12/09/2010 06:35:09 PM
- 661 Views
no, i'm also saying that from a technical standpoint they are not BAD
12/09/2010 09:24:09 PM
- 695 Views
Baldur's Gate came out in 1998. You know what that means, right?
12/09/2010 10:08:49 PM
- 661 Views
It all depends on what criteria you're using
13/09/2010 01:56:37 AM
- 624 Views
I know, and I said as much. Several times.
13/09/2010 05:17:14 AM
- 613 Views
Re: I know, and I said as much. Several times.
13/09/2010 05:54:12 AM
- 670 Views
That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
13/09/2010 06:11:59 AM
- 667 Views
Re: That is one of the most tortuous definitions of quality I have seen in my life.
13/09/2010 08:59:33 AM
- 610 Views
This is a meaningless conversation.
13/09/2010 06:30:07 PM
- 589 Views
Your post + Dr. Pepper + front row of serious computer security class = dangerous situation. *NM*
13/09/2010 07:28:34 PM
- 285 Views
below modern standards doesn't mean "bad"
13/09/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 614 Views
You're a fucking idiot.
13/09/2010 09:00:28 PM
- 583 Views
I'm arguing for the fun of it is what I'm arguing about
13/09/2010 11:17:46 PM
- 638 Views
Please don't.
14/09/2010 02:20:33 AM
- 615 Views
that's fine wish you were a cmb admin *NM*
14/09/2010 03:35:19 AM
- 318 Views
Hm. I'd have to buy a lot more donuts if I worked over there. *NM*
14/09/2010 04:07:51 AM
- 302 Views
Haha, I'm just happy that what I said made any sense....I honestly don't remember posting that. *NM*
12/09/2010 06:31:52 PM
- 374 Views
I've noticed that MMO's that have tried to usurp WoW with superior graphics have failed.
12/09/2010 07:33:13 PM
- 638 Views
I agree, I was shocked that my netbook could run wow at acceptable settings
13/09/2010 05:21:44 AM
- 572 Views
Why would I want to? *NM*
13/09/2010 04:21:19 PM
- 309 Views