Link with graphics card comparison, and it isn't looking good... - Edit 1
Before modification by Zalis at 28/07/2010 07:52:39 PM
Compare these two lists...
Look for the 6600GT on this one:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=7
And the X3100 on here:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=23
Trouble is, even with the faster X3100, it doesn't compare very well in areas like texture fill rates and memory bandwidth. It's not as far behind on clock speeds, but I'm really doubting it would leave you with satisfactory performance.
That being said, we could cross fingers and hope Blizzard was being stingy with the reqs? Not likely, though.
Look for the 6600GT on this one:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=7
And the X3100 on here:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=23
Trouble is, even with the faster X3100, it doesn't compare very well in areas like texture fill rates and memory bandwidth. It's not as far behind on clock speeds, but I'm really doubting it would leave you with satisfactory performance.
That being said, we could cross fingers and hope Blizzard was being stingy with the reqs? Not likely, though.