Don't forget the roll to make sure he lands on the creature.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/06/2010 08:59:42 AM
That'd probably be a Jump skill check or a Dexterity check, depending on the DM's discretion. Possibly some sort of other check to verify that he manages to grip the monster enough to remain upon it initially (as in doesn't just splat on him and slip off). That would probably be after the dmg rolls (Assuming contact), and probably only if the DM was anal.
so, it'd be something like:
roll to land, attack/dmg rolls mentioned above, roll to determine if your landing "stuck" , rolls to continue to stay on (the ride-type rolls mentioned)
Given the different physics, I would put the "sticking" roll different to the 'riding" rolls, but that's just me personally.
but yah. your dm's just being lazy/a dick. There's no reason within the rules or physics that this shouldn't be allowed.
so, it'd be something like:
roll to land, attack/dmg rolls mentioned above, roll to determine if your landing "stuck" , rolls to continue to stay on (the ride-type rolls mentioned)
Given the different physics, I would put the "sticking" roll different to the 'riding" rolls, but that's just me personally.
but yah. your dm's just being lazy/a dick. There's no reason within the rules or physics that this shouldn't be allowed.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 16/06/2010 at 09:05:05 AM
Riding a hostile creature
15/06/2010 09:58:07 PM
- 642 Views
Your DM was being a dick.
16/06/2010 02:08:17 AM
- 587 Views
Don't forget the roll to make sure he lands on the creature.
16/06/2010 08:59:42 AM
- 613 Views
And if you are playing 4th ed, which kicks 3.5's ass ( ), then you'd do something similar.
16/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
- 542 Views
mm. two things that bother me about 4th edition
17/06/2010 05:16:07 AM
- 533 Views
Yep.
18/06/2010 12:28:08 AM
- 476 Views
I don't much mind 4th edition, wasn't trying to make a big argument
18/06/2010 01:09:01 PM
- 521 Views
Also: I'm confused by what you mean when you say "core" classes.
18/06/2010 04:26:59 AM
- 476 Views
I'm talking about the classes which DnD has always associated with as "Core"
18/06/2010 01:27:27 PM
- 528 Views
Those ARE all in the Player's Handbook 1.
18/06/2010 06:16:45 PM
- 503 Views
Yah, I was just signing on to say that they seem to have fixed that
19/06/2010 06:07:43 AM
- 545 Views
Well... 3rd edition had about a million books. So that's not exactly a new trend *NM*
19/06/2010 03:56:20 PM
- 215 Views
Agreed. Ihaven't DM'd since 2nd edition, but :
18/06/2010 09:25:41 AM
- 564 Views
depending on how complicated you wanted to make it...
18/06/2010 01:30:37 PM
- 515 Views
Indeed. The number 1 rule for any DM: never say no. If a player wants to do something, let them try.
18/06/2010 06:31:20 PM
- 515 Views