Active Users:1122 Time:22/11/2024 04:03:41 PM
Possibly not, but only if it would be immoral for your victims to refuse to cure your loved one. - Edit 6

Before modification by Burr at 16/04/2010 04:37:14 PM

If they'd rather cure someone else, or do something else that a reasonable person could expect to be just as beneficial (and presumably this would require saving someone's life in some way), then you'd have a moral obligation to help them to mitigate your crimes.

The point is, morally you don't really deserve a choice. The only way you aren't morally obligated to give up the cure is if you are morally obligated to override an obviously immoral choice made by your victims.

Return to message