Active Users:1099 Time:22/11/2024 11:59:03 PM
I think there is a difference in British English Tom Send a noteboard - 08/04/2010 06:19:59 PM
I was under the impression that "sick" in British usage meant nausea/vomiting only, whereas "ill" meant generally not in good health. Americans use the terms quite interchangeably.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
/language: Being sick and being ill - 08/04/2010 05:14:36 PM 674 Views
Not too much, generally. - 08/04/2010 05:19:37 PM 943 Views
Re: Not too much, generally. - 08/04/2010 05:27:12 PM 556 Views
Thanks both of you *NM* - 08/04/2010 05:30:29 PM 269 Views
I don't know if there's a literal definition... - 08/04/2010 05:46:41 PM 541 Views
I think there is a difference in British English - 08/04/2010 06:19:59 PM 530 Views
I don't know if it is what you are asking - 08/04/2010 07:39:38 PM 605 Views
No, they are not the same - 08/04/2010 08:02:00 PM 495 Views
it depends: are you doing a crossword puzzle? *NM* - 09/04/2010 12:47:05 AM 249 Views
I always say "ill" when it's something indelicate. - 09/04/2010 05:16:17 AM 611 Views
I typically use them in the following way. - 09/04/2010 07:28:46 AM 560 Views
UK says "ill" for unwell and "be sick" for "to vomit". US says "sick" for "unwell". - 09/04/2010 08:44:02 AM 581 Views
I knew it! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:29:23 AM 269 Views

Reply to Message