Active Users:466 Time:04/04/2025 09:54:11 PM
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

I don't know your situation but from my experience many of the people who complain about tend to be people who eat a lot of convenient food. I can make a very healthy meal in my kitchen for what a meal at your average drive through would cost.

Even so it is true that it does cost a little more to eat healthy. Potatoes are cheaper then tomatoes but I think it is money well spent and if I had to make a choice there would be multiple things I would cut out of my life before I cut healthy food out.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1273 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 590 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 648 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 548 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 618 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 643 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 696 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 743 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 591 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 587 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 822 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 679 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 646 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 632 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 653 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 598 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 568 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 590 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 713 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 673 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 703 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 607 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 556 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 567 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 528 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 589 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 687 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 801 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 659 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 909 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 603 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 636 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 596 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 630 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 553 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 547 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 647 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 728 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 288 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 570 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 287 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 653 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 634 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 306 Views

Reply to Message