Active Users:885 Time:22/11/2024 02:54:39 AM
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

I don't know your situation but from my experience many of the people who complain about tend to be people who eat a lot of convenient food. I can make a very healthy meal in my kitchen for what a meal at your average drive through would cost.

Even so it is true that it does cost a little more to eat healthy. Potatoes are cheaper then tomatoes but I think it is money well spent and if I had to make a choice there would be multiple things I would cut out of my life before I cut healthy food out.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1205 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 521 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 580 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 475 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 548 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 571 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 631 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 662 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 523 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 509 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 757 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 606 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 576 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 559 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 587 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 552 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 492 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 520 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 646 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 611 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 632 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 535 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 487 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 491 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 463 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 523 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 609 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 736 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 580 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 846 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 534 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 562 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 532 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 556 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 490 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 477 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 579 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 660 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 267 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 507 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 263 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 591 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 568 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 279 Views

Reply to Message