Active Users:426 Time:22/02/2025 02:28:56 PM
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
Seriously, what is your deal? Did someone make you the "fixate on one potentially offensive part of a post" admin? I said something that could have been misconstrued, clarified it and I think both Larry and I are on the same page. I certainly don't think I was entirely wrong (Larry conceded that the tensions are at least different, which is a point I can concede as better expressing what I meant) in what I said, but I wasn't wholly right either.

But the basic point of my post WAS right. And that's something that you frustratingly keep ignoring for the sake of your own self-righteousness.

Well fine, go ahead and praise yourself for being so understanding and respectful of other cultures. I on the other hand, prefer to cut the crap and talk about the actual issue.

If you'd like to do so as well, let me know.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2728 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 715 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 750 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 854 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 793 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 727 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 818 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 658 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 612 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 681 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 412 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 704 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 855 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 644 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 675 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 716 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 708 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 399 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 398 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 376 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 701 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 711 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 862 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 711 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 947 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 660 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 668 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 707 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 798 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 913 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1038 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 701 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 727 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 947 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 667 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 734 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 754 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 789 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 829 Views

Reply to Message