Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
Oh, I agree that such an ad would never see the light of day here, but certain things said/shown here would not be broadcast there, either. It's just different in what's acceptable and what is not. Cultural differences, more or less.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
Oh, and as far as I can recall, there wasn't a history of racial segregation in Western Europe on the scale that there was here in the US through the mid-20th century. That and the lack of identifiable civil rights leaders may have something to do with it as well.
I see I see. I've always thought we're a little too sensitive to racial tensions here in the US, but there are times when europeans seem to do things that are downright offensive. The spanish basketball team to name one (I'm not sure if you're familiar but they pulled their eyes back making them thin for a photoshoot for the beijing olympics) and I've heard some seriously concerning stories about african soccer players playing in spain and other parts of europe.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
- 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
2749 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
- 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
774 Views
Uh.
- 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
868 Views
Re: Uh.
- 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
807 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
742 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
- 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
831 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
673 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
- 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
630 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
- 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
418 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
- 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
718 Views
Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
869 Views
Re: Um.
- 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
657 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
- 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
687 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
- 29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
685 Views
I don't see it
- 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
724 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
- 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
713 Views
It would not float here in the US
- 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
726 Views
Agreed.
- 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
879 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
- 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
726 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
- 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
964 Views
MOBO
- 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
676 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
- 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
723 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
- 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
715 Views
Agreed
- 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
745 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
375 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
961 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
- 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
680 Views