They can tell all that from an old pinky bone they dug up? Maybe it was just a person whose mother was also her sister or some such thing. Forgive me if I remain sceptical until they find something more than a pinky bone.
Well, they can extract DNA from fossilised mammoths, so why not a human(oid) pinky bone? Note that this does not give any information about looks, constitution or way-of-life, as stated in the article.
We've just recently "cracked" the DNA code right? I mean I'm no scientist, but if we're at the early stages of understanding DNA coding and sequences there is a lot that is subject to error. I'm certainly not saying it's not possible that she's a distant ancestor of humans I'm just not buying it, at the moment. I need something a bit more concrete than a pinky bone.
And doesn't generations of inbreeding cause all kinds of weird issues? Again, not saying this is the case, just asking.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
25/03/2010 03:26:22 AM
- 561 Views
Yes, I found that very exciting (link to new scientist article)
25/03/2010 08:02:55 AM
- 361 Views
Humans and chimps have a last shared ancestor ca 5 million years ago *NM*
25/03/2010 12:51:22 PM
- 132 Views
Yes, but
25/03/2010 12:53:17 PM
- 388 Views
sounds like she would have been somewhere between Neanderthal and Homo Erectus
25/03/2010 05:09:29 PM
- 346 Views
Re: Possible new human ancestor found in Siberia
25/03/2010 04:21:03 PM
- 413 Views
DNA doesn't get weird because of that
25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
- 355 Views
Correct me if I'm wrong but...
25/03/2010 04:54:51 PM
- 406 Views
You are wrong.
25/03/2010 05:34:44 PM
- 349 Views
Usually when you correct someone
25/03/2010 06:40:49 PM
- 412 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
25/03/2010 06:46:02 PM
- 357 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
25/03/2010 06:50:07 PM
- 386 Views
Re: Usually when you correct someone
25/03/2010 06:51:45 PM
- 391 Views
it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
25/03/2010 05:41:18 PM
- 429 Views
Re: it doesn't take much understanding of a gene sequence to place it.
25/03/2010 06:46:56 PM
- 504 Views
what would they have to find for you?
25/03/2010 06:59:34 PM
- 300 Views
Re: what would they have to find for you?
25/03/2010 07:16:47 PM
- 396 Views
okay, think of it this way then.
25/03/2010 07:47:38 PM
- 365 Views
What the? You've been in my office?
25/03/2010 08:09:08 PM
- 361 Views
*shake head* DNA analysis doesn't need more than a pinky finger.
25/03/2010 04:42:45 PM
- 324 Views
Please reread what I said
25/03/2010 04:56:32 PM
- 390 Views
please learn to fire your neurons.
25/03/2010 05:28:10 PM
- 350 Views
Re: please learn to fire your neurons.
25/03/2010 05:35:51 PM
- 461 Views
living in a small city in Kansas
25/03/2010 05:41:54 PM
- 321 Views