The judge has effectively struck down dress codes in public schools
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 11:43:39 AM
The judge ruled that the girls First Amendment rights were violated, which sets a precedent for other schools. But he wouldn't order the school to hold a prom as he's got no legal basis to make them if they don't want to.
Assuming he is referring to her intention to wear a tuxedo. With this as a precedent, how can any attire that does not meet the definition of public nudity be forbidden? It's all about self-expression after all. On this principle obscenity & bigotry can be expressed in clothing, and forbidding it is a violation of First Amendment rights.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
So, I see the judge ruled in favor I the lesbian girl whose prom was cancelled.
- 24/03/2010 07:38:13 AM
603 Views
You're both right.
- 24/03/2010 10:34:50 AM
430 Views
The judge has effectively struck down dress codes in public schools
- 24/03/2010 11:43:39 AM
427 Views
well since higher courts have up held dress codes I don't think we need to worry to much
- 24/03/2010 03:20:17 PM
351 Views
I want to see what an obscene tuxedo would look like on a woman.....
- 24/03/2010 05:24:57 PM
497 Views
It's airbrushed on. 
- 25/03/2010 07:04:12 AM
332 Views
- 25/03/2010 07:04:12 AM
332 Views