Active Users:445 Time:01/11/2024 01:46:35 AM
I don't think that's the point though... MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 09:35:29 PM
It also would probably make people less prone to ignoring state elections.


That's how senators USED to be elected. Unfortunately, we ignored the advice of the founders and now we're in this perpetual campaign mess of a government.

Reid's in a tough spot because his six years are up, but for a supermajority of Senators they don't have to sweat until Obama does. The problem isn't direct elections, it is, IMHO, that the far greater number of House members combined with two year terms that DO force constant campaigns makes it difficult to accomplish anything there. As I said repeatedly on wotmania, what I'd like is a Constitutional Amendment (which is what it would take, and why it will never happen) that would make the far more powerful Senators accountable to the public every two years and the far more numerous (and thus less potent) House members only have to run every six. It might not elevate the level of House proceedings to that of the Senate, but it would help to both give House members a chance to do their jobs and make the far more powerful Senators more accountable. It's VERY hard to unseat an incumbent Senator, and you have to wait six years for the chance; given the far greater power of a Senator that doesn't seem wise to me.


Senators DO admit that it's constant campaigning for most of them (with the exception of those few who've held a seat for decades, like the late Ted Kennedy). The whole principle of a bicameral legislature was that one represented the masses the other represented the...for lack of a better expression, intellectual elite. The House is constantly campaigning, not looking out for the good of the country in all cases (but still representing the voice of the people). The Senate (used to) represent those whose aims did not depend as much on a vote or pleasing the masses who usually aren't the most educated or knowledgeable on the subject. Since a bill has to pass both legislatures, the interests of the nation and its people should both get proper attention.

Nowadays, Senators don't have that luxury. It's a sad state Congress is in. If you wanna blame nothing getting done on something, blame it on partisanship, which is hurting this nation greatly. If it were up to me, there would be no political parties.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Reply to message
Obamacare: Explained? - 22/03/2010 07:21:44 PM 664 Views
Someone had a good link earlier... - 22/03/2010 07:32:36 PM 505 Views
Thanks - 23/03/2010 03:48:04 AM 290 Views
What the bill does, and when each part gets implemented - 22/03/2010 07:42:26 PM 574 Views
This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite. - 22/03/2010 07:47:59 PM 326 Views
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt - 22/03/2010 07:52:29 PM 362 Views
this is why I believe in dictatorships - 22/03/2010 08:05:14 PM 310 Views
It's all populism, really - 23/03/2010 03:51:31 AM 304 Views
OOoo I like that idea. - 23/03/2010 04:20:48 AM 312 Views
Re: OOoo I like that idea. - 23/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 310 Views
Senators don't constantly campaign though. - 23/03/2010 04:20:51 PM 295 Views
I don't think that's the point though... - 23/03/2010 09:35:29 PM 326 Views
At one point some of the concerns were valid. - 23/03/2010 06:03:29 AM 486 Views
Re: At one point some of the concerns were valid. - 23/03/2010 03:05:58 PM 373 Views
We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term. - 23/03/2010 04:12:14 PM 405 Views
Re: We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term. - 23/03/2010 09:40:53 PM 403 Views
Can't find that link in this thread, but the CBO seems to agree with you, not me. - 23/03/2010 11:47:29 PM 612 Views
I don't agree - 24/03/2010 08:52:12 PM 402 Views
"Free market" is a VERY big phrase. - 25/03/2010 07:32:06 AM 307 Views
Re: "Free market" is a VERY big phrase. - 25/03/2010 10:31:13 PM 429 Views
I'm not sure competition is a primary goal of capitalism. - 29/03/2010 12:14:06 PM 409 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite. - 22/03/2010 08:04:50 PM 309 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite. - 22/03/2010 08:07:39 PM 301 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite. - 22/03/2010 08:28:10 PM 309 Views
ah yah. Fair enough. - 22/03/2010 10:01:41 PM 304 Views
The $900 billion is essentially just government subsidies: Healthcare's gotten THAT expensive. - 23/03/2010 06:23:01 AM 322 Views
you make it sound like this is the end-all bill. - 23/03/2010 12:01:20 PM 300 Views
I doubt we'll see another bill after the reconciliation bill. - 23/03/2010 02:05:59 PM 310 Views
I agree 100% - 23/03/2010 03:18:08 PM 307 Views
Too bad for America. - 23/03/2010 04:29:19 PM 338 Views
no, the "now or doomed" mindset is not why I'm willing to wait - 23/03/2010 03:23:21 PM 312 Views
Well, if you really are waiting for them to fix it later you'll wait a long time. - 23/03/2010 04:33:25 PM 285 Views
broken legs are not longer a good metaphor - 24/03/2010 12:33:14 AM 292 Views
Most people still understand what I mean. - 29/03/2010 01:16:35 PM 286 Views
Not surprising - 23/03/2010 10:37:25 PM 304 Views
Supposedly it's fixing part of that. - 23/03/2010 11:21:32 PM 306 Views
It's quite simple. - 23/03/2010 04:23:45 PM 363 Views
And what does government-run health care have to do with this bill? - 23/03/2010 04:25:28 PM 320 Views
You mean it is still - 23/03/2010 04:29:55 PM 314 Views

Reply to Message