Yes, THIS bill didn't do much in the way of cost mitigation.
And I'll be annoyed if the next one doesn't...but until then, I'm willing to wait.
And I'll be annoyed if the next one doesn't...but until then, I'm willing to wait.
You're falling for the "we have to pass this horrible bill now or healthcare reform is doomed for a generation111" BS that Obama and Co. used to gain support for the bill. In Washington, declaring victories heading into elections is more important than actually ACHIEVING victories, which is why Obamas instructions to Reid on negotiations with Lieberman basically consisted of "give away the store if you have to, but get his vote. "
After all the struggle and damage to both sides NO ONE will have any taste for revisiting this issue. Especially since the prevalent view will be that it's finally been settled (which is the first thing opponents of real reform will say, followed by claims their charges of incremental socialism were right all along. ) This bill is ironic in many ways: It's biggest critics are its greatest beneficiaries, it's biggest supporters are its most unlikely defenders and since few cost controls will exist even after the reconciliation bill it will likely just inflate costs as the mad scramble for a trillion plus dollars ensues. And, of course, most ironically, passing it will actually accomplish what it's supposed to prevent: The end of healthcare reform for a generation.
We're done with healthcare for a while unless republicans take power.
I doubt you'll find a majority of Republicans who want to address healthcare reform in any other terms than repealing this bill and/or turning healthcare reform into their perennial baby, tort reform (because limiting Toyotas liability when a faulty accelerator kills someone will obviously lower medical costs for the nation. ) It's not a winning issue for them; they might manage to repeal the individual mandate, but that's about it. Fact is, for all the whining, this is a VERY industry friendly bill (which has been a hallmark of Obamas legislation to date) so they have no reason to reopen this can of worms if they win a majority and every reason not to do so. You'd think that the way healthcare is consuming a huge and rapidly growing chunk of our GDP would stir some patriotic fervor to save the country from bankruptcy, but there's been no sign of that so far from either party. My working theory is they just plan to stash their salaries in the Caymans or Switzerland and move to Europe, but if I were Europe I wouldn't let them in after what they did to THIS country.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Obamacare: Explained?
22/03/2010 07:21:44 PM
- 670 Views
Someone had a good link earlier...
22/03/2010 07:32:36 PM
- 514 Views
Thanks
23/03/2010 03:48:04 AM
- 293 Views
They don't, or at least not in this bill. That'll have to be a new bill.
23/03/2010 09:22:19 AM
- 314 Views
What the bill does, and when each part gets implemented
22/03/2010 07:42:26 PM
- 582 Views
This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 07:47:59 PM
- 332 Views
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt
22/03/2010 07:52:29 PM
- 369 Views
this is why I believe in dictatorships
22/03/2010 08:05:14 PM
- 316 Views
It's all populism, really
23/03/2010 03:51:31 AM
- 310 Views
OOoo I like that idea.
23/03/2010 04:20:48 AM
- 318 Views
Re: OOoo I like that idea.
23/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 317 Views
Senators don't constantly campaign though.
23/03/2010 04:20:51 PM
- 303 Views
I don't think that's the point though...
23/03/2010 09:35:29 PM
- 334 Views
To the extent the framers intended an elitist legislature, they erred, IMHO.
29/03/2010 01:43:34 PM
- 414 Views
At one point some of the concerns were valid.
23/03/2010 06:03:29 AM
- 492 Views
Re: At one point some of the concerns were valid.
23/03/2010 03:05:58 PM
- 380 Views
We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term.
23/03/2010 04:12:14 PM
- 410 Views
Re: We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term.
23/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
- 409 Views
Can't find that link in this thread, but the CBO seems to agree with you, not me.
23/03/2010 11:47:29 PM
- 620 Views
I don't agree
24/03/2010 08:52:12 PM
- 407 Views
"Free market" is a VERY big phrase.
25/03/2010 07:32:06 AM
- 314 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:04:50 PM
- 314 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:07:39 PM
- 310 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:28:10 PM
- 316 Views
The $900 billion is essentially just government subsidies: Healthcare's gotten THAT expensive.
23/03/2010 06:23:01 AM
- 326 Views
you make it sound like this is the end-all bill.
23/03/2010 12:01:20 PM
- 307 Views
I doubt we'll see another bill after the reconciliation bill.
23/03/2010 02:05:59 PM
- 315 Views
I agree 100%
23/03/2010 03:18:08 PM
- 312 Views
Too bad for America.
23/03/2010 04:29:19 PM
- 345 Views
no, the "now or doomed" mindset is not why I'm willing to wait
23/03/2010 03:23:21 PM
- 320 Views
Well, if you really are waiting for them to fix it later you'll wait a long time.
23/03/2010 04:33:25 PM
- 290 Views
It's quite simple.
23/03/2010 04:23:45 PM
- 370 Views
And what does government-run health care have to do with this bill?
23/03/2010 04:25:28 PM
- 328 Views