Active Users:474 Time:22/12/2024 06:32:53 PM
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music

This one, I don't quite follow.

Which I think is true of music in general; again, there may be cultural predispositions, but music doesn't come with a genotype. If it were strictly "black" music there are a lot of European countries where a jazz station wouldn't be economically viable.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
That's Before We Even Touch American Issues Like This:
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2692 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 688 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 722 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 832 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 770 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 704 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 795 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 637 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 589 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 657 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 403 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 679 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 831 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 620 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 650 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 694 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 686 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 390 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 387 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 365 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 680 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 690 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 843 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 689 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 922 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 634 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 651 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 686 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 776 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 881 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1008 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 678 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 705 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 919 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 645 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 710 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 728 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 766 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 806 Views

Reply to Message