Active Users:2021 Time:22/01/2025 09:22:52 AM
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music

This one, I don't quite follow.

Which I think is true of music in general; again, there may be cultural predispositions, but music doesn't come with a genotype. If it were strictly "black" music there are a lot of European countries where a jazz station wouldn't be economically viable.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
That's Before We Even Touch American Issues Like This:
Reply to message
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio - 22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM 2708 Views
I'd say that's pretty racist. - 22/03/2010 01:53:59 PM 697 Views
I don't think it's racist at all - 22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM 732 Views
Uh. - 22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM 839 Views
Re: Uh. - 29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM 778 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM 712 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim - 29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM 804 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM 644 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here - 29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM 599 Views
An illustration of Larry's point... - 29/03/2010 08:14:55 PM 669 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM* - 29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM 406 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~ - 29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM 688 Views
Um. - 29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM 840 Views
Re: Um. - 29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM 626 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to. - 29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM 660 Views
I was thinking the same thing as Rebekah - 23/03/2010 07:15:51 AM 704 Views
I don't see it - 22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM 696 Views
+1 *NM* - 22/03/2010 08:30:01 PM 392 Views
Re: +2 *NM* - 22/03/2010 09:53:43 PM 391 Views
Re: +3 *NM* - 22/03/2010 10:00:55 PM 369 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words - 22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM 688 Views
It would not float here in the US - 22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM 698 Views
Agreed. - 23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM 850 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning? - 23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM 698 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races. - 23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM 932 Views
MOBO - 23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM 643 Views
Nice term, if a bit clumsy - 23/03/2010 11:10:34 AM 657 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think. - 23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM 694 Views
I suspect so as well - 23/03/2010 12:32:00 PM 782 Views
Well, the thing is, "American" is PURELY a culture, not a race. - 23/03/2010 01:55:59 PM 893 Views
That's part of what I was thinking - 23/03/2010 07:50:19 AM 1019 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view. - 23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM 686 Views
Agreed - 23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM 712 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race. - 23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM 926 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted. - 23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM 652 Views
perhaps not as default... - 23/03/2010 03:08:19 PM 718 Views
The term encompasses listeners, performers and presenters. - 23/03/2010 04:42:55 PM 737 Views
So it's really not about skin color any more, right? - 23/03/2010 09:12:20 PM 775 Views
it's racist and unacceptable. - 23/03/2010 09:07:10 PM 814 Views

Reply to Message