In part because "black music" is an antiquated term at best and quite insulting in several contexts. The black paint would be construed by several as being related to blackface attire and that is very controversial here and has been for at least one generation, if not two.
Interesting how social mores differ from culture to culture, though.
Interesting how social mores differ from culture to culture, though.
I'm reminded of the recent kerfluffle over the Down Under minstrel show, how strongly Harry Connick Jr. reacted to it on the scene and how baffled everyone else was at the time. I can see how Connick, as a New Orleans musician and son of a LA Supreme Court Justice, would have a very visceral reaction to a 21st Century minstrel show (and I believe the American controversy over that is more than just a couple generations old. ) I can also see how people overseas would be completely at a loss to understand it (though, in all fairness, it shouldn't be as hard to grasp in Australia. ) The mere fact there's a version of the commercial with both a black and white radio host gives the lie to the idea of "black" music, but I can see how Europe wouldn't be as sensitive (or hypersensitive) to the concept as America because the legacy is very different.
I'd say it's "quasi-racist" because musical tastes and/or talent are not racially defined, though obviously cultural predispositions exist. It's all well to say Mozart was the first rock star, but while he might have picked up rock had he been exposed to it, he never was and thus never composed any.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Is it racist?: Commercial for Jazz/Soul radio
22/03/2010 01:47:45 PM
- 2683 Views
I don't think it's racist at all
22/03/2010 07:15:55 PM
- 713 Views
Uh.
22/03/2010 09:36:35 PM
- 826 Views
Re: Uh.
29/03/2010 07:03:14 PM
- 761 Views
I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
29/03/2010 07:20:09 PM
- 696 Views
Re: I'm not Dutch, but that was a pretty ignornant claim
29/03/2010 07:28:34 PM
- 788 Views
Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
29/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
- 631 Views
Re: Not "higher" nor "lower," but "different" would be the word to use here
29/03/2010 07:53:56 PM
- 583 Views
This. ~points at Larry's post~ *NM*
29/03/2010 07:42:35 PM
- 399 Views
Re: This. ~points at Larry's post~
29/03/2010 07:57:30 PM
- 672 Views
Um.
29/03/2010 08:00:54 PM
- 821 Views
Re: Um.
29/03/2010 08:44:31 PM
- 613 Views
My question for you was on that one line that Larry responded to.
29/03/2010 08:46:26 PM
- 643 Views
She agrees with you about it not being racist - she had issues with your "crude" comment.
29/03/2010 08:59:44 PM
- 644 Views
I don't see it
22/03/2010 08:19:31 PM
- 679 Views
i'd say the actions in the commercial are more racist than the words
22/03/2010 10:00:02 PM
- 674 Views
It would not float here in the US
22/03/2010 10:07:08 PM
- 683 Views
Agreed.
23/03/2010 05:36:14 AM
- 837 Views
Could you please expand on one point in your reasoning?
23/03/2010 07:20:31 AM
- 682 Views
It's not race specific music if it's enjoyed/performed/presented by various races.
23/03/2010 07:32:33 AM
- 915 Views
MOBO
23/03/2010 10:20:22 AM
- 627 Views
The trouble lies in historical neuroses cooked in our melting pot, I think.
23/03/2010 11:29:06 AM
- 677 Views
Only if it's racist to mention the fact that different races exist. Which seems to be the US view.
23/03/2010 09:24:23 AM
- 669 Views
Agreed
23/03/2010 10:21:59 AM
- 697 Views
Some people are like that, yes, but at least it isn't the "accepted" media position. Yet. *NM*
23/03/2010 11:01:47 AM
- 353 Views
Not at all, the problem is when people seem to say something is exclusive to a given race.
23/03/2010 11:51:06 AM
- 909 Views
I agree with some of what you say, but I think you're assuming more than is warranted.
23/03/2010 02:33:34 PM
- 637 Views