Active Users:345 Time:01/04/2025 02:24:30 AM
On a certain level I do agree with you Brian Send a noteboard - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM
The populous is often ignorant and ill-informed (given the vast quantities of information people now have to pick through to find the unbiased facts, and how few people do so, I still think these are valid labels).

Theoretically, the politicians should have a knowledge/expert-base available to make decision that the ignorant lay person would err on out of ignorance. While they should take the desires and motivations of their constituency into account, it is also their responsibility to use their (theoretical) greater knowledge to make a better and more informed decision than your average grocer would make. In fact, I would say it is a failure of the politician to make a decision that appeases his constituency rather than helps them. Not to say that the desires of his constituents should not be considered. Just that I think it is a disservice to merely appease your "clients" than actually serve them.

But I'm going into a medical profession, so I might have an unrealistic point of view on the matter.

I think people on the whole are idiots that rarely know what they are talking about and prefer to hear biased propaganda from one side or the other of an argument rather than unbiased facts that allow them to come to their own conclusion. Generally speaking I think it's pretty fair to say that I think the average intelligence level of people in this country, and really worldwide, is nothing to be proud of.

That said....I think that in a majority of situations the people that represent us in Congress should be primarily concerned with what their constituents want, because they were elected to represent and speak for their constituents. Obviously they have to do so within reason, but in situations where the public has had plenty of time to make up their mind about a specific bill or issue and you go against your constituent's desires, then I think you are doing them a disservice.

I don't know that any health care bill was ever going to get wide spread support though, so I'll take this one, and hope that the areas where I personally think there needs to be a lot more work done get the attention they need, and that the health care system gets fixed once and for all.
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1296 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 650 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 616 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 763 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 592 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 620 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 553 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 680 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 706 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 630 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 677 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 796 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 588 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 594 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 746 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 310 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 308 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 650 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 901 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 675 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 381 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 308 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1066 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 769 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 615 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 604 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 697 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 331 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 269 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 616 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 626 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 808 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 619 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 623 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 621 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 732 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 803 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 706 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 630 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 604 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 617 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 625 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 544 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 735 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 753 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 631 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 609 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 702 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 593 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 595 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 647 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 611 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 668 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 268 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 701 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 719 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 634 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 604 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 709 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 555 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 563 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 750 Views

Reply to Message