Active Users:473 Time:24/12/2024 03:32:22 PM
Re: Heh Macharius Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM
My hope is that now that something is in place that some people sit down and really try to tackle the whole cost control issue.


Cost control is easy:

1. Eliminate the fee-for-service model that only encourages bloat and inefficiency.

2. Force hospitals and clinics to advertise/make public the costs of treatment, so patients can make an informed decision (the billing department knows what everything costs, why can't we?). Also, doctors should provide a choice to patients where possible.

I specifically make that last sentence because my fiancee was told to show up for surgery a week before she was ready; resulting in unnecessary usage of pre/post-op space and staff not to mention the OR itself. Waiting a week would have saved work, time, drugs, and most importantly prevented a lot of pain on her part... not to mention leaving us with $3000 less in bills). Oh, and a day of paid vacation time on my part to be with her in the hospital during all this. The surgeon even mentioned that some other doctors told patients to just come back in two weeks, why was he trying to rush her in after only three days?!

3. Make it so that insurance companies actually have to compete amongst each other(health care coverage is the least competitive industry in the economy). I think I saw Tom post a more thorough explanation of this several weeks ago.

4. Something about malpractice suits.

I'm sure a few/some/many/most would disagree with that, but that's how I see things. ;)
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1264 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 590 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 551 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 702 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 524 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 562 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 496 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 614 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 648 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 563 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 616 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 735 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 524 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 534 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 678 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 278 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 278 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 587 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 842 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 620 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 356 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 279 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 994 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 695 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 546 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 543 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 656 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 300 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 243 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 555 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 573 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 745 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 558 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 555 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 555 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 674 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 734 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 642 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 567 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 535 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 556 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 554 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 479 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 656 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 688 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 561 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 544 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 635 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 522 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 538 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 584 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 541 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 605 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 244 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 632 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 661 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 570 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 546 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 644 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 488 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 501 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 684 Views

Reply to Message