Hopefully actually having had the major bill go through will mean people will be kicked into working together to sort it out properly, rather than trying to kill it without offering a sensible alternative.
Precisely, now that there is a law, they can work to make it better. Even though a lot of dems commited political suicide, it needed to get passed.
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1284 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
637 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
602 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
752 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
574 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
606 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
540 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
612 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
665 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
782 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha 
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
731 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
731 Views
why? 
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
303 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
303 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
301 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
638 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
670 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
325 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
614 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
796 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
603 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
616 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
670 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
719 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
786 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
694 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
721 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
617 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
590 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
601 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
597 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
625 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
625 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands *NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
298 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
298 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
700 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
611 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
720 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
738 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
616 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
709 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
592 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
746 Views