Active Users:596 Time:24/12/2024 04:07:05 PM
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill. Inigo Montoya Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
You may be right about reform having to start now, too. I'm rather torn on the issue, myself - the bill as passed is not that bad in itself, but it *is* bad, even disastrous, if it's the only bill that's going to be passed for the next five or ten years. So if the polarization and ugliness that this bill has sown is such that Congress waits years before trying to pass additional reforms, I'm afraid it wasn't worth that. As such, I still think a more bipartisan bill should've been possible.


Yea, that's the thing. This bill doesn't do nearly enough on it's own to truly change or save the system financially. But I have to think it makes it a hell of alot easier going foward to make more impactful reforms down the line now that the initial hurdle has been cleared. Especially if it can be explained in terms to the public that the figures (like Klein uses that graph to illustrate) are only a drop in the bucket of our total healthcare spending. When people see that this bill hasn't taken away any "freedom" as the crazy, loud right would have us believe and has given almost everyone access to care when they're sick, I think further reform will be much more palatable to the people down the road. Especially if some of the cost-saving pilot programs included in this bill are actually coming up with real results that can be shown demonstrably to save money.
Formerly DannyBoy31
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1264 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 590 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 551 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 702 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 525 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 563 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 496 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 614 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 648 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 564 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 616 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 735 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 524 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 534 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 679 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 278 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 278 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 587 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 842 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 620 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 357 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 280 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 994 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 695 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 547 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 543 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 657 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 300 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 244 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 555 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 573 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 745 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 558 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 556 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 555 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 674 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 734 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 642 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill. - 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM 670 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 567 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 535 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 556 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 555 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 479 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 656 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 688 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 561 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 545 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 635 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 523 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 538 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 584 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 542 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 605 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 244 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 632 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 661 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 571 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 547 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 644 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 488 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 501 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 684 Views

Reply to Message