That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute)
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM
Pet hate of mine but I feel that common use of mute is a pretty offensive thing to do.
You completely miss my point... you are giving a pretty simple minded answer, to drag it down to the kind of terms you are using for this. Could they bring him in alive? There is a fair chance of it. It is it a good decision on pretty much any level? No, no it really isn't.
The best option by some distance is a dead bin Laden, and the ability to bring him in alive can get screwed because that is a stupid move that creates almost as many problems as it solves.
Yes. Because it is - we are talking about a hypothetical that to me is more like asking "so, how are the anti-Martian defenses in Houston?" or "So how will the international court of human rights prosecute ghost Mao?"
Could happen... but really, really unlikely and an honest answer is to admit that, rather than play politics like you want him to.
That's not honest, and it's also a dumb answer fir him to give. If he knows anything about HRT, SF, SAS, etc tactics he'd know that depending on the circumstances capture could easily be the highest probable outcome. A night time assault could easily have his guards overwhelmed and him on the floor being zip-tied before he even knew what was happening, it would just depend on the circumstances.
You completely miss my point... you are giving a pretty simple minded answer, to drag it down to the kind of terms you are using for this. Could they bring him in alive? There is a fair chance of it. It is it a good decision on pretty much any level? No, no it really isn't.
The best option by some distance is a dead bin Laden, and the ability to bring him in alive can get screwed because that is a stupid move that creates almost as many problems as it solves.
It's also irrelevant, he knew what the question was, he, the Attorney General, was being asked a hypothetical question about what is supposed to be his area of expertise by definition. If the head of Homeland Security got asked by congress 'If Houston was nuked by a suitcase bomb, what would the response be?' and she replied 'well, I think that's unlikely, a nuke would likely be set off in NYC or DC, so it's a pointless question.' both parties would be expecting her resignation by week's end. You gonna say her answering a question like that wouldn't be ducking but 'too honest'?
Yes. Because it is - we are talking about a hypothetical that to me is more like asking "so, how are the anti-Martian defenses in Houston?" or "So how will the international court of human rights prosecute ghost Mao?"
Could happen... but really, really unlikely and an honest answer is to admit that, rather than play politics like you want him to.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
AG Eric Holder evades questioning
- 17/03/2010 05:34:40 PM
663 Views
Why should he be read miranda rights?
- 17/03/2010 05:50:29 PM
446 Views
Why should location matter when dealing with a borderless threat like al-Qaeda? *NM*
- 17/03/2010 10:20:08 PM
175 Views
You'd rather he walk free on a technicality?
- 17/03/2010 11:28:30 PM
408 Views
Line 1
- 18/03/2010 07:14:56 AM
546 Views
Last I checked, al-Qaeda isn't a party to the Geneva Convention.
- 18/03/2010 09:16:15 AM
466 Views
That only means they are not entitled to its protections - in other words, they are fair game.
- 19/03/2010 10:25:50 PM
401 Views
Well, I guess it depends whether you want to try him, doesn't it?
- 19/03/2010 11:34:34 PM
382 Views
*shrugs*
- 17/03/2010 11:10:47 PM
406 Views
That doesn't seem very logical
- 18/03/2010 12:03:21 AM
493 Views
That is honest and it wouldn't be "dumb" (I assume you actually mean stupid, rather than mute)
- 18/03/2010 12:19:58 AM
459 Views
It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:12:21 AM
355 Views
Re: It is very possible
- 18/03/2010 02:31:59 AM
460 Views
You do remember "I do not recall" Gonzalez right? *NM*
- 18/03/2010 02:38:48 AM
167 Views
Actually not really, I was out of the country for almost his entire tenure
- 18/03/2010 02:41:13 AM
371 Views
Pretty much there was some political firings of Us Attorneys
- 18/03/2010 02:56:01 AM
408 Views
I remember a little of that
- 18/03/2010 03:16:27 AM
390 Views
Gonzales flat out lied to congress
- 18/03/2010 03:29:14 AM
378 Views
Seems he could answer the question without evasion or producing a soundbite
- 18/03/2010 04:12:04 AM
428 Views
I don't think I agree with that.
- 18/03/2010 02:04:48 PM
396 Views
Fair enough
- 18/03/2010 02:40:42 PM
390 Views
You guys are forgetting the intel aspect.
- 18/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
411 Views
do we know how much he actually knows?
- 18/03/2010 09:49:50 PM
385 Views
Kinda hard to find out if he knows anything if he's dead *NM*
- 18/03/2010 09:56:18 PM
178 Views
that was totally not my question 
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
381 Views
- 19/03/2010 12:10:06 AM
381 Views
Most people include congressmen/women don't understand Miranda rights,most people don't know the Law
- 18/03/2010 02:08:10 AM
487 Views
I can understand why he'd want to evade answering.
- 18/03/2010 03:23:04 AM
455 Views
I can understand why statesman would want to avoid painting himself into a corner.
- 29/03/2010 02:26:34 PM
343 Views