But prop 8 seems to be more about heteros than not. Any one of them could have just as much of a conflict of interest, given that their "side" is trying to refuse something that (imo) should be considered a right. Who's to say a hetero judge would make any better (more just or balanced) of a call if he/she firmly believes that homosexual marriage is Wrong?
If he's a good judge, it shouldn't matter either way.
If he's a good judge, it shouldn't matter either way.
Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay
- 11/02/2010 12:13:46 AM
838 Views
Re: Prop 8 Judge, assigned case by random, turns out to be gay *NM*
- 11/02/2010 02:47:40 AM
271 Views
I'm betting on 'Uphold', but his orientation probably won't effect the ruling either way
- 11/02/2010 04:16:40 AM
441 Views
Why are you betting on Uphold?
- 11/02/2010 04:22:03 AM
438 Views
For what it's worth, I think he should recuse himself.
- 11/02/2010 09:35:18 AM
464 Views
I should keep my nose out.
- 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM
485 Views
- 11/02/2010 12:40:13 PM
485 Views
It doesn't automatically touch heterosexuals interests.
- 11/02/2010 12:53:50 PM
465 Views
It was always going to be appealed. *NM*
- 11/02/2010 05:50:45 PM
188 Views
Yes, but if he doesn't recuse it's guaranteed, whatever the outcome.
- 15/02/2010 01:06:32 PM
422 Views