They have abused the word liberal so badly that they won't even use it any more so I see no reason to let them do the same to the word progress.
So what does that make Congress?
Today's Political Silliness is brought to you by the Letters, Y and T.
Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Why does the American interpretation of "liberal" differ from the European?
09/02/2010 09:15:39 AM
- 722 Views
For the last century or so liberal has meant the same in the UK as in the US.
09/02/2010 09:30:07 AM
- 637 Views
Because the US started off with the idea of freedom of individuals...
09/02/2010 09:40:59 AM
- 492 Views
Using that word "marxist" really undermines the credibility of your post. *NM*
09/02/2010 10:25:42 AM
- 170 Views
Only to people who don't understand Marxism in the slightest! *NM*
09/02/2010 02:32:39 PM
- 167 Views
Eh, obviously you can point to elements of Marxist influence in the Democratic Party...
09/02/2010 02:52:34 PM
- 452 Views
Anytime the people who object to an ideology are permitted to define it...
09/02/2010 10:56:46 PM
- 405 Views
Because they got offended when they were called socialist and progressive didn't stick *NM*
09/02/2010 02:09:10 PM
- 177 Views
Hah. Progressive wasn't dirty-sounding enough for the other side to go along with it *NM*
09/02/2010 07:35:35 PM
- 207 Views
no were just not willing to let them soil another word
09/02/2010 08:18:58 PM
- 409 Views
And to think, the antonym to Pro is Con...
09/02/2010 08:52:30 PM
- 459 Views
1988. george bush vs. michael dukakis
10/02/2010 03:37:13 AM
- 445 Views
In America we typically now refer to true liberals (i.e. Locke) as "classical liberal(ism)"
12/02/2010 05:06:38 AM
- 513 Views