Active Users:3303 Time:22/01/2025 06:46:12 PM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1734 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 424 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 535 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 488 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 445 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 470 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 187 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 434 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 187 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 543 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 449 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 195 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 466 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 492 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 176 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 440 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 528 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 491 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 611 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 531 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 563 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 442 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 429 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 440 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 607 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 446 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 505 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 627 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 571 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 777 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 594 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 415 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 548 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 479 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 182 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 192 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 409 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 449 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 497 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 369 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 434 Views

Reply to Message