Active Users:388 Time:29/04/2025 01:28:22 AM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1788 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 473 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 587 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 538 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 504 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 521 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 202 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 484 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 207 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 597 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 497 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 215 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 516 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 541 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 197 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 495 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 584 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 541 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 659 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 582 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 615 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 491 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 482 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 490 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 661 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 495 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 555 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 675 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 626 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 823 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 665 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 447 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 600 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 535 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 198 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 217 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 457 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 495 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 542 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 390 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 481 Views

Reply to Message