Active Users:336 Time:11/04/2025 09:41:43 PM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1782 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 468 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 580 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 532 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 497 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 515 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 197 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 479 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 204 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 591 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 491 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 211 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 509 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 536 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 195 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 488 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 576 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 535 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 655 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 576 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 608 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 484 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 476 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 483 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 654 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 490 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 551 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 670 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 620 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 817 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 659 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 441 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 593 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 529 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 196 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 214 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 452 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 489 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 538 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 387 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 473 Views

Reply to Message