Active Users:860 Time:23/12/2024 11:31:07 AM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1714 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 406 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 516 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 469 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 427 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 446 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 183 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 417 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 180 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 524 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 434 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 190 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 441 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 474 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 169 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 414 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 506 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 469 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 594 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 515 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 540 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 421 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 411 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 416 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 591 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 425 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 486 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 608 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 556 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 760 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 570 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 406 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 531 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 460 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 173 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 180 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 391 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 429 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 479 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 363 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 416 Views

Reply to Message