Based on the documentary IOUSA:
The National Center for Policy Analysis released a paper by Pamela Villarreal highlighting the results of the 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports.
Some highlights:
The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today's dollars! That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt, says Pamela Villarreal, a senior policy analyst with the National Center for Policy Analysis.
The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums. Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion. If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both, says Villarreal.
Currently, a 12.4 percent payroll tax on wages funds Social Security and a 2.9 percent payroll tax funds Medicare Part A. But if payroll tax rates rise to meet unfunded obligations:
When today's college students reach retirement (about 2054), Social Security alone will require a 16.6 percent payroll tax, one-third greater than today's rate.
When Medicare Part A is included, the payroll tax burden will rise to 25.7 percent -- more than one of every four dollars workers will earn that year.
If Medicare Part B (physician services) and Part D are included, the total Social Security/Medicare burden will climb to 37 percent of payroll by 2054 -- one in three dollars of taxable payroll, and twice the size of today's payroll tax burden!
Thus, more than one-third of the wages workers earn in 2054 will need to be committed to pay benefits promised under current law. That is before any bridges or highways are built and before any teachers' or police officers' salaries are paid.
The Social Security and Medicare deficits are on a course to engulf the entire federal budget. If our policymakers wait to address these growing debts until they are out of control, the solutions will be drastic and painful, says Villarreal.
The National Center for Policy Analysis released a paper by Pamela Villarreal highlighting the results of the 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports.
Some highlights:
The 2009 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports show the combined unfunded liability of these two programs has reached nearly $107 trillion in today's dollars! That is about seven times the size of the U.S. economy and 10 times the size of the outstanding national debt, says Pamela Villarreal, a senior policy analyst with the National Center for Policy Analysis.
The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums. Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion. If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both, says Villarreal.
Currently, a 12.4 percent payroll tax on wages funds Social Security and a 2.9 percent payroll tax funds Medicare Part A. But if payroll tax rates rise to meet unfunded obligations:
When today's college students reach retirement (about 2054), Social Security alone will require a 16.6 percent payroll tax, one-third greater than today's rate.
When Medicare Part A is included, the payroll tax burden will rise to 25.7 percent -- more than one of every four dollars workers will earn that year.
If Medicare Part B (physician services) and Part D are included, the total Social Security/Medicare burden will climb to 37 percent of payroll by 2054 -- one in three dollars of taxable payroll, and twice the size of today's payroll tax burden!
Thus, more than one-third of the wages workers earn in 2054 will need to be committed to pay benefits promised under current law. That is before any bridges or highways are built and before any teachers' or police officers' salaries are paid.
The Social Security and Medicare deficits are on a course to engulf the entire federal budget. If our policymakers wait to address these growing debts until they are out of control, the solutions will be drastic and painful, says Villarreal.
*MySmiley*
For Europeans who don't understand why Americans are against ObamaCare
03/09/2009 04:24:35 AM
- 1151 Views
I'd be happy to tax top "earners" more and suffer Europes economic "collapse. "
03/09/2009 04:30:31 AM
- 624 Views
The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:40:21 AM
- 709 Views
Re: The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:58:47 AM
- 700 Views
I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
03/09/2009 05:04:34 AM
- 619 Views
It's advanced beyond what it was during the Revolution, I think.
03/09/2009 05:18:22 AM
- 660 Views
I would say it's grown with the government
03/09/2009 05:23:52 AM
- 647 Views
The key is that government shouldn't be heavily involved in personal lives.
03/09/2009 05:58:39 AM
- 667 Views
Re: I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
04/09/2009 03:30:23 AM
- 584 Views
How much more can we really tax the wealthy??
03/09/2009 04:41:14 AM
- 549 Views
A lot; before Reagans "reforms" we already taxed them less than any other industrialized state did.
03/09/2009 05:06:00 AM
- 665 Views
I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:19:08 AM
- 530 Views
Re: I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:40:32 AM
- 616 Views
Nice non-answer answer.....
03/09/2009 05:52:04 AM
- 625 Views
You want detailed answers that require detailed data I don't have.
03/09/2009 06:06:55 AM
- 681 Views
Here are some facts and analyses.....
03/09/2009 02:40:22 PM
- 704 Views
The Heritage Foundation, huh?
03/09/2009 03:01:17 PM
- 733 Views
The non-working wealthy? Please quantify.....
03/09/2009 03:31:58 PM
- 719 Views
So you accept the CBOs assessment the House healthcare bill will be $1 trillion over the next decade
04/09/2009 03:02:13 AM
- 609 Views
You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:15:55 AM
- 698 Views
Re: You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:59:21 AM
- 784 Views
Less than 200 people were said to be US persons with Swiss accounts
04/09/2009 04:16:24 AM
- 580 Views
And yet account for many millions of dollars; what does that say...?
04/09/2009 04:21:57 AM
- 616 Views
It's statistically insignificant and your hyperbole is reminiscent of screaming guests on CNN.
04/09/2009 02:07:31 PM
- 518 Views
Well, look at this way:
04/09/2009 02:24:03 PM
- 658 Views
That's not a solution.
05/09/2009 02:39:12 AM
- 669 Views
The Soviets weren't socialist, or even communist, so it's a false comparison.
05/09/2009 03:09:06 AM
- 608 Views
Okay, now you've just gone into Kool-aid drinking territory.
05/09/2009 04:32:07 AM
- 718 Views
Communist THEORY is predicated on democratic participation at every level,totally absent in the USSR
05/09/2009 04:55:00 AM
- 837 Views
Ever heard of the 20-80 rule?
04/09/2009 04:28:54 AM
- 527 Views
Top earners? Please define.....what income and how much more? *NM*
03/09/2009 04:52:25 AM
- 429 Views
That would be open to definition, and should change with inflation.
03/09/2009 05:13:02 AM
- 778 Views
What is your justification for taking over 50% of anyone's income?
03/09/2009 05:28:22 AM
- 707 Views
That's a good example of why I say the rate has to be set to cost of living.
03/09/2009 05:50:16 AM
- 740 Views
Still no comment on the fact that 40% of Americans don't pay any income taxes?
03/09/2009 02:32:12 PM
- 668 Views
To what 40% do you refer?
03/09/2009 02:42:55 PM
- 524 Views
Dude, you are not making this easy.....
03/09/2009 03:38:01 PM
- 561 Views
No one "gets money from the IRS. "
04/09/2009 02:55:02 AM
- 574 Views
Actually with EIC you can get money back that you never paid in.
04/09/2009 02:56:43 AM
- 558 Views
It MIGHT be possible with the EIC, but in practice few people get more than they paid.
04/09/2009 03:43:36 AM
- 598 Views
I don't know, I've known plenty of people that have gotten more back than they paid in
04/09/2009 03:46:29 AM
- 689 Views
Yet another example of your ignorance on tax policy.
04/09/2009 03:19:39 AM
- 510 Views
The word I notice is "welfare"
04/09/2009 03:57:01 AM
- 626 Views
I wouldn't say that's what it means....
04/09/2009 04:02:40 AM
- 629 Views
It's what welfare means to me...
04/09/2009 04:32:17 AM
- 634 Views
I was just talking about EIC as a form of welfare, not welfare welfare. *NM*
04/09/2009 04:45:13 AM
- 387 Views
It's a credit for people who file a return on income that's been taxed.
04/09/2009 04:19:57 AM
- 559 Views
It is only for the WORKING poor, yes.
04/09/2009 02:12:55 PM
- 549 Views
Mean it may be, but hardly illegal.
04/09/2009 02:31:16 PM
- 581 Views
No real comments, just 100% agree with you....plus the $12 trillion is terrifying to me. *NM*
03/09/2009 04:33:39 AM
- 273 Views
If that scares you, check this out!
03/09/2009 04:48:56 AM
- 669 Views
Excellent post - the US government is not capable of running HC.....
03/09/2009 04:40:19 AM
- 505 Views
It depends on your level of cynicism
03/09/2009 05:38:53 AM
- 675 Views
when have they ever cut the fat?
03/09/2009 08:35:36 PM
- 595 Views
This doesn't make sense to me.
03/09/2009 08:33:18 AM
- 643 Views
The key phrase is "should be. "
03/09/2009 09:38:15 AM
- 779 Views
In fairness, most Europeans don't seem to realize what ObamaCare is.
03/09/2009 02:34:01 PM
- 668 Views
As far as most people I know are concerned, opposition to ObamaCare isn't the issue.
03/09/2009 11:04:36 PM
- 740 Views
It's hard not to be horrified with a government as wasteful as ours
03/09/2009 11:24:59 PM
- 524 Views
For Americans who don't understand why Canadians like their public healthcare.
04/09/2009 04:23:11 AM
- 644 Views
Correction
04/09/2009 04:44:32 AM
- 626 Views
Re: Correction
04/09/2009 05:05:11 AM
- 704 Views