Active Users:450 Time:29/12/2024 04:32:36 PM
you do realize the saints were #2 in takeaways this year? moondog Send a noteboard - 25/01/2010 11:52:56 PM
I think creating turnovers are great and teams should try to do it but I think you need to be able to win without them.

Now the fact that the Saints have 13-3 season and they are going to the Superbowl takes away from my argument to large degree but I still think it is too unreliable of a strategy to rely on. I would prefer a defense that can reliably stop the other offense and force them to punt to one who gives up a lot of yards and hopes to be able to create a turnover.

Of course be able to do both would be ideal.


second only to the packers in takeaways over the course of the entire season. i'd say it's been a part of their game plan all along, and the reason they rely on it is because it's worked for them for the most part. i don't think they draw their game plan up expecting to get the takeaways, but you could tell the way they played last night that getting the takeaway was a huge priority especially after the 3rd time the vikings fumbled the ball.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
WTF Fields a Punt at the ONE YARD LINE?!!! - 25/01/2010 01:49:19 AM 688 Views
You are a terrible person. *NM* - 25/01/2010 02:01:25 AM 249 Views
The Vikings fanbase deserve a win at least as much as ya'll. - 25/01/2010 02:27:22 AM 539 Views
No, they really don't. - 25/01/2010 02:40:49 AM 463 Views
That ship sailed the last time Indy went. - 25/01/2010 03:16:57 AM 556 Views
As I said, it's the first time the Saints will have gone. - 25/01/2010 03:19:22 AM 482 Views
Oh, yeah, the Vikes had their chances.... - 25/01/2010 03:56:28 AM 627 Views
This is probably a really stupid question - 25/01/2010 02:52:29 AM 526 Views
Because of the chessgame; you put in defensive personnel based on who's in the huddle. - 25/01/2010 03:13:30 AM 498 Views
As much as I hate to admit it - 25/01/2010 03:17:59 AM 523 Views
I really though Minnesota had the better team, but with all those fumbles it's hard to say that now. - 25/01/2010 03:21:56 AM 515 Views
Well, the better team doesn't always win (Just ask the 2007-08 Patriots ) - 25/01/2010 03:33:51 AM 531 Views
*shakes fist* - 25/01/2010 03:39:01 AM 611 Views
Sorry Monroe - 25/01/2010 03:52:49 AM 455 Views
*does not bring it up* - 25/01/2010 03:58:49 AM 536 Views
yeah, I get it. - 25/01/2010 12:27:47 PM 602 Views
I think that Minnesota had the better team - 25/01/2010 06:42:26 PM 586 Views
You've finally said something I agree with 100%. - 25/01/2010 07:39:11 PM 483 Views
you make no sense - 25/01/2010 08:56:48 PM 480 Views
well most of the time you try and stop the other team from getting first downs - 25/01/2010 09:21:12 PM 442 Views
you do realize the saints were #2 in takeaways this year? - 25/01/2010 11:52:56 PM 530 Views
none of that changes that I don't think it is a great strategy long term - 26/01/2010 01:07:54 AM 522 Views
i'm torn - 26/01/2010 01:13:30 AM 538 Views

Reply to Message