The insurance exchanges in the Senate bill will already do that.
Joel Send a noteboard - 19/01/2010 02:25:32 AM
Of course, Faux may not be reporting that, what with the more important story about how they may get to dance on all the Kennedys graves....
And COBRA already allows people to take insurance with them for a while after they leave, if at too high a price currently. The proposals floated to "allow" people to continue coverage are driven by an insurance lobby who wanted companies to be able to lock in policy holders so that even if they find a better deal than they've got they can't legally switch. It's not so people can take insurance with them, it's so they can't escape a horrible insurer (I almost said "private insurer" but that's the only kind we have unless you're >65. ) They didn't get that, but they are getting a helluva lot out of this bill; it's the biggest private subsidy since the Agricultural Adjustment Act.
It's a crap bill, but it's the only one the table, which is the only reason the leaders of the "left" insist we have to take it. I was on board with that for a while, willing to stomach a lot of the things I disliked about the bill, until they removed every last one of its benefits except the insurance exchanges. Now it's a net negative (by a large amount) that actually makes the status quo look GOOD by comparison, so I guess, on this bill, I'm a conservative.
having insurance follow you when you leave job. Most republicans support insurance reforms just not as radical as what the dems are putting out there. They don't see the insurance companies as the enemy. Also as mentioned they support tort reform, which the dems oppose because it would hurt trial lawyers.
They don't have complete agreed up on plan but then again neither did the dems until they spent most of the year hashing one out. They still don’t have one they can agree on. Minority parties don't typically put forward complete pieces of legislation.
They don't have complete agreed up on plan but then again neither did the dems until they spent most of the year hashing one out. They still don’t have one they can agree on. Minority parties don't typically put forward complete pieces of legislation.
And COBRA already allows people to take insurance with them for a while after they leave, if at too high a price currently. The proposals floated to "allow" people to continue coverage are driven by an insurance lobby who wanted companies to be able to lock in policy holders so that even if they find a better deal than they've got they can't legally switch. It's not so people can take insurance with them, it's so they can't escape a horrible insurer (I almost said "private insurer" but that's the only kind we have unless you're >65. ) They didn't get that, but they are getting a helluva lot out of this bill; it's the biggest private subsidy since the Agricultural Adjustment Act.
It's a crap bill, but it's the only one the table, which is the only reason the leaders of the "left" insist we have to take it. I was on board with that for a while, willing to stomach a lot of the things I disliked about the bill, until they removed every last one of its benefits except the insurance exchanges. Now it's a net negative (by a large amount) that actually makes the status quo look GOOD by comparison, so I guess, on this bill, I'm a conservative.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat?
18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
- 584 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
- 169 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
- 168 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
- 178 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
- 169 Views
It makes people question their priorities
18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
- 240 Views
Maybe they should.
18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
- 196 Views
You act like America is a collective
18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
- 254 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
- 157 Views
Tort reform
18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
- 155 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
- 80 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
- 156 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
- 155 Views
that simply proves they are inept
19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
- 154 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
- 180 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
- 162 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
- 235 Views
Curious about the last part.
20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
- 246 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
- 154 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
- 215 Views
The insurance exchanges in the Senate bill will already do that.
19/01/2010 02:25:32 AM
- 187 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
- 287 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
- 147 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
- 140 Views
I know who I'm voting for!
18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
- 199 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
- 195 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
- 235 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
- 263 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
- 237 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
- 187 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
- 170 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
- 166 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
- 279 Views