Or, if they don't care that much about the non-insured, then what are they at least offering to lessen the enormous costs in percentage of GDP that the US spends on health care?
seems to be about it, to cut insurance costs.
Disclaimer: Anyone with proper facts are welcome to correct me, this is mostly an impression that I've picked up from watching the health care debate.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat? 
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
584 Views
- 18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
584 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
- 18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
168 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
- 18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
167 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
- 18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
178 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
- 18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
169 Views
It makes people question their priorities
- 18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
239 Views
Maybe they should.
- 18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
195 Views
You act like America is a collective
- 18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
254 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
- 18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
156 Views
Tort reform
- 18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
155 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
- 18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
79 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
- 18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
156 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
- 18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
155 Views
that simply proves they are inept
- 19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
153 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
- 19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
179 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
- 19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
162 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
- 19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
235 Views
Curious about the last part.
- 20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
245 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
- 20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
154 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
- 20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
214 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
- 19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
287 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
- 20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
147 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
- 20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
140 Views
I know who I'm voting for! 
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
199 Views
- 18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
199 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
- 18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
194 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
- 18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
235 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
- 18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
263 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
- 18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
237 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
- 18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
187 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
- 18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
170 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
- 18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
166 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
- 19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
279 Views