Active Users:543 Time:24/02/2025 11:55:05 PM
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either Floffe Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM
She says she walked away from the conversation, that doesn't mean she walked away from the friendship. Her friend may be saying they can't be friends if they don't agree but that is not how I read it. May I misread but rereading it I still don’t see anywhere it says her friends is refusing to continue the friendship. Now I didn't read every reply to the post so there may have been something there I missed.

I think that's why Aisha put the "may" in the topic, they had this conversation which her friend walked out of, and haven't sorted it out yet. But still, it was not Aisha who walked out. In fact, up on top she stated she was fine with her friend believing she'd go to hell since she doesn't believe in Jesus as her personal saviour.

Friends can have falling outs and still remain friends. Friends can also disagree on politics and religion.

Exactly, and from this post it certainly seems her friend has more of a problem with it that Aisha does.
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
Reply to message
I may have lost a friend over same sex marriage - 17/01/2010 08:03:26 AM 1455 Views
the problem with your friend is the "southern evangelical christian" part - 17/01/2010 09:07:02 AM 763 Views
They believe gay marriage is ongoing unrepentant sin. - 17/01/2010 12:04:58 PM 762 Views
God your a moron. - 17/01/2010 09:10:17 PM 716 Views
be nice - 18/01/2010 06:26:58 AM 618 Views
<shrug> They can believe that all that they like - 18/01/2010 08:07:28 PM 671 Views
And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 18/01/2010 11:10:51 PM 674 Views
Re: And live accordingly. Just like everyone else. - 20/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 632 Views
It is, I believe, hardest for the intelligent educated man. - 21/01/2010 10:29:39 AM 761 Views
You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 17/01/2010 10:12:11 AM 659 Views
LOL... *NM* - 18/01/2010 05:21:14 AM 361 Views
You and Adam are being equally unconstructive. - 18/01/2010 06:21:45 AM 580 Views
why do you imply "constructive" is in anyway the intent? *NM* - 18/01/2010 06:32:27 AM 286 Views
*shrug* I never stopped believing in lost causes? - 18/01/2010 07:36:04 AM 578 Views
Re: You can't use logic in an irrational argument. - 18/01/2010 06:28:41 AM 716 Views
Always welcome. - 18/01/2010 07:31:27 AM 817 Views
We finally converted you - 17/01/2010 08:43:25 PM 602 Views
Not much of a friend then. Good ridance to bad friends. *NM* - 17/01/2010 08:51:02 PM 429 Views
I agree. A friend who can't respect differences of opinion is no friend at all. *NM* - 17/01/2010 09:11:33 PM 287 Views
seriously. *NM* - 17/01/2010 10:46:17 PM 246 Views
Only because such sentiment is my pet peeve...condemning exclusivity is hypocritical. *NM* - 19/01/2010 12:37:37 AM 312 Views
yeah no kidding - 18/01/2010 06:30:45 AM 584 Views
It forces other people to accept THEIR ideology that same sex unions are legitimate. - 18/01/2010 01:49:20 AM 759 Views
I would assume, then, that you don't support any government-mandated health care? - 18/01/2010 02:07:40 AM 579 Views
Correct - 18/01/2010 04:29:04 AM 666 Views
Although I disagree with the vast majority of your arguments, - 18/01/2010 08:50:09 AM 635 Views
Thank you. - 20/01/2010 01:47:34 AM 811 Views
Please tell me you have a source for that quotation. Other than me. - 21/01/2010 12:31:27 PM 671 Views
It's GK Chesterton! What the hell are you going on about? - 27/01/2010 02:41:00 AM 548 Views
Link? - 27/01/2010 09:28:22 AM 645 Views
I can't find a link to the exact quote - 27/01/2010 12:14:19 PM 753 Views
Re: Link? - 27/01/2010 01:38:36 PM 774 Views
Perhaps we should define our terms more precisely. - 15/02/2010 11:28:09 AM 1142 Views
we do not exist in a free market. - 18/01/2010 04:09:37 AM 589 Views
And that's bad. Since when has the correct response to oppression been "accept further oppression"? *NM* - 18/01/2010 04:30:44 AM 294 Views
I am simply pointing out your arguments do not apply to the present economic environment. - 18/01/2010 04:46:04 AM 537 Views
No I am not. - 19/01/2010 10:44:31 PM 668 Views
That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:19:57 AM 622 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 04:41:27 AM 639 Views
civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 18/01/2010 04:49:12 AM 619 Views
Re: civil marriages DO have a purpose. - 19/01/2010 10:47:18 PM 679 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:13:54 AM 625 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 19/01/2010 10:59:45 PM 586 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 18/01/2010 07:15:50 AM 703 Views
Re: That's utter nonsense. - 20/01/2010 01:38:37 AM 506 Views
Are you at all surprised? - 18/01/2010 07:59:30 AM 612 Views
A truly free country means I don't have the freedom to shoot you - 18/01/2010 05:57:44 AM 707 Views
You really said nothing, right there. - 18/01/2010 08:34:33 AM 660 Views
I presume you are equally against the current set up - 18/01/2010 12:31:33 PM 691 Views
He said as much in his response to me above. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:37:49 PM 232 Views
That's such an amusing argument - 18/01/2010 08:17:15 PM 580 Views
I'm against people with pasta based nicknames on fantasy forums *NM* - 19/01/2010 03:03:31 PM 253 Views
cannoli is a pastry *NM* - 19/01/2010 07:25:04 PM 231 Views
I have no problem with people with pastry based names, just pasta - 21/01/2010 12:28:44 AM 543 Views
I can't help but find it funny - 18/01/2010 12:51:57 PM 556 Views
So... - 18/01/2010 03:39:33 PM 701 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out - 18/01/2010 04:11:05 PM 580 Views
you acept your friends with their warts or you don't - 18/01/2010 06:45:13 PM 687 Views
I think you missed who was the one to walk out *NM* - 18/01/2010 08:01:25 PM 215 Views
I don't think it was that clear - 18/01/2010 10:01:32 PM 612 Views
I don't think it is all that clear yet, either - 18/01/2010 10:27:54 PM 643 Views
I wasn't taking sides - 18/01/2010 10:57:39 PM 518 Views

Reply to Message