Healthcare may be a long term economic issue but we have some serious short term economic issues that should have gotten attention first. Instead of making fixing the economy top priority they decided to try and push through a ton of liberal wish list stuff.
If they had been smart they would have focused the first year on economy and ignored the social issues for now, which is what this healthcare bill really is since it designed to give healthcare to the uninsured instead of actually reforming the system. A strong economic push would have given them the momentum and built the trust they needed to push their big social programs. Instead of banking reform and programs to spur the economy we got pork spending disguised as stimulus. Instead of post partisan we got blame Bush, attack Fox and ridicule the tea party protesters. Instead of fresh start on foreign policy we get snubs to England, capitulations to Russia and bowing to petty princes. No Obama wasted his chance and the vote in Mass for a republican is a vote against far left single party politics.
If they had been smart they would have focused the first year on economy and ignored the social issues for now, which is what this healthcare bill really is since it designed to give healthcare to the uninsured instead of actually reforming the system. A strong economic push would have given them the momentum and built the trust they needed to push their big social programs. Instead of banking reform and programs to spur the economy we got pork spending disguised as stimulus. Instead of post partisan we got blame Bush, attack Fox and ridicule the tea party protesters. Instead of fresh start on foreign policy we get snubs to England, capitulations to Russia and bowing to petty princes. No Obama wasted his chance and the vote in Mass for a republican is a vote against far left single party politics.
The Not So New Left, for example, needs to ask itself whether declaring victory is really more important than actually WINNING something; Obama may be able to say healthcare wasn't his "Waterloo" (it takes two to be bipartisan, y'know... ) but in terms of advancing liberal policy he hasn't done squat. And I can pretty much bet without that sentiment in "taxachusetts" both the healthcare bill and the Dem Senate candidate would be polling much higher than anything the Republicans are suggesting (what exactly ARE they suggesting, other than not doing what any of the Dems want?) This is a Fox story, which is why I saw it there on the way out the door this morning, with the on the scene reporter telling us how ironic it is that the healthcare bill is hurting Dems in MA "which has nearly universal healthcare. " I'm sure Romney appreciates the plug, but last I heard it wasn't working out that way (which is why the US doesn't need Romneycare, not even from Obama. )
But don't kid yourself: The cost of healthcare is a short term, CURRENT, economic problem; it's just dwarfed by the economic CRISIS looming between 2020 and 2030 if we allow healthcare costs to keep doubling every decade. Frankly, I don't get it; Americans pay more money for less care than Europeans but feel sorry for THEM. It takes a special kind of "out of touch" to watch a dozen countries surpass our standard of living then warn the rest of us we don't want to do what they did and suffer the same "disaster. " The number of insured Americans is going down, not up, due to cost, and employers are scaling back coverage as they get priced out of the market. We're rapidly reaching a point where a government printing imaginary money will be the only one who CAN afford insurance. Except all the new Medicare enrollees in 2020 will bankrupt that, too (and apparently some Dems thought the "solution" to that was to enroll them NOW. )
Sometimes when I survey the American political landscape I feel like Diogenes, except I've given up looking for an honest man and now desperately search for a thinking man.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Could the Dems really lose in Mass - Kennedy's seat?
18/01/2010 03:19:29 PM
- 584 Views
to quote yogi berra: it ain't over till it's over
18/01/2010 04:10:26 PM
- 168 Views
Oh, if Brown wins, I'm sure he will be out next election.....
18/01/2010 04:28:05 PM
- 167 Views
Even if he loses and it is close I think it will scare a lot of democrats
18/01/2010 04:15:03 PM
- 178 Views
If we don't get a handle on healthcare it will destroy the economy.
18/01/2010 06:01:18 PM
- 169 Views
It makes people question their priorities
18/01/2010 08:17:16 PM
- 239 Views
Maybe they should.
18/01/2010 09:47:11 PM
- 196 Views
You act like America is a collective
18/01/2010 10:16:39 PM
- 254 Views
Is it? What are the Republicans offering for the non-insured?
18/01/2010 10:20:42 PM
- 156 Views
Tort reform
18/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
- 155 Views
Ah yes. Which they're quite right about, of course - but one item does not a policy make. *NM*
18/01/2010 10:35:55 PM
- 79 Views
purchase insurance across state lines
18/01/2010 10:44:54 PM
- 156 Views
the dems don't see insurance companies as the enemy either
18/01/2010 11:09:24 PM
- 155 Views
that simply proves they are inept
19/01/2010 01:45:33 PM
- 153 Views
Or in the lobbies' pockets, or both; now you understand why the left is as mad as the right.
19/01/2010 11:55:14 PM
- 179 Views
Of course they did nothing for the 6 years they controlled Congress.
19/01/2010 12:39:44 AM
- 162 Views
That isn't true, my mother-in-law can now afford to buy her medicine
19/01/2010 01:57:28 PM
- 235 Views
Curious about the last part.
20/01/2010 12:05:40 AM
- 245 Views
There are some basic flaws in your argument
20/01/2010 03:18:58 PM
- 154 Views
The state laws are the result of the gentlemens agreement and the feds not minding the store.
20/01/2010 06:18:50 PM
- 214 Views
America, like all groups of people, IS a collective, however diverse.
19/01/2010 02:02:24 AM
- 287 Views
but it doesn't think like a collective
20/01/2010 03:25:29 PM
- 147 Views
Yes, I realize human beings are selfish; that's something to overcome, not embrace.
20/01/2010 06:21:33 PM
- 140 Views
I know who I'm voting for!
18/01/2010 04:26:29 PM
- 199 Views
That whole "filibuster-proof" concept was a lot more valid...
18/01/2010 04:44:51 PM
- 194 Views
I have seen this argument elsewhere and I am not sure it makes sense
18/01/2010 05:28:57 PM
- 235 Views
It does not make sense if it's used in a partisan way, that's true.
18/01/2010 05:43:10 PM
- 263 Views
I think the fillibuster is with in the spirit and the law on the constitution
18/01/2010 06:03:55 PM
- 237 Views
I hope so. If people like me support Brown, then you know the Democrats are fucked.
18/01/2010 05:13:27 PM
- 187 Views
It's amazing, but even GWB and the R's didn't alienate the public so quickly.....
18/01/2010 10:02:27 PM
- 170 Views
I read Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com and he's refusing to call it...
18/01/2010 11:03:03 PM
- 166 Views
Wuss (that's directed facetiously at Silver, btw, not you seriously. )
19/01/2010 02:31:58 AM
- 279 Views