Active Users:1276 Time:19/12/2024 01:18:58 PM
What, another one of these? LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 04/01/2010 06:17:12 PM
Given that there are probably thousands of women who would raise their hands and go "uhm, I must be the exception to your rule then", I heavily doubt it's just our imaginations.

If their method was seriously only asking between twins too, that's the most ridiculous sounding method of discovering a physical attribute I've ever heard of.

To Identical Twin 1: Would you call your hair...blonde?
Twin 1: Oh goodness no!! Much more of a Light Brown!!
To Identical Twin 2: Would you call your hair blonde?
Twin 2: Of course! It may be dark but it has characteristic golden tones!!
Scientists Conclusion: They're disagreeing, so it must be all in their heads and blonde hair does not in fact exist.

Obviously an exaggerated example, but point made. It's a good thing they didn't discover things like Livers and Kidneys just by doing questionnaires.


Not to mention there have been plenty of anatomical studies to support the variable existence of a "G-Spot". Something doesn't have to exist 100% of the time to be a valid anatomical attribute, you know. Lymph Nodes, for example, can be highly variable outside of the few major ones.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
"G-spot" doesn't exist according to new study - 04/01/2010 05:44:29 PM 1158 Views
If they're looking for a magic button that excites women, they should be looking inside diamonds. *NM* - 04/01/2010 05:47:57 PM 155 Views
Not all women like diamonds you know. - 04/01/2010 06:18:45 PM 436 Views
Yes, some like sapphires and emeralds. *NM* - 04/01/2010 07:24:05 PM 161 Views
LOL *NM* - 04/01/2010 07:03:14 PM 167 Views
they may be right - 04/01/2010 06:02:34 PM 477 Views
damn straight we know more about it. *NM* - 04/01/2010 06:09:32 PM 152 Views
What, another one of these? - 04/01/2010 06:17:12 PM 520 Views
If its my imagination, I want to be "die" there! *NM* - 05/01/2010 04:00:53 PM 162 Views
Women's G-spots are their penises, just like men. *NM* - 04/01/2010 06:29:27 PM 154 Views
no, the clitoris is analogous to the penis. - 04/01/2010 06:56:38 PM 445 Views
That's what I meant: clitoris = penis *NM* - 05/01/2010 06:31:31 PM 175 Views
Bullshit. - 04/01/2010 07:20:18 PM 459 Views
You tell them, Beverly! - 04/01/2010 07:45:29 PM 431 Views
Hmmm... - 04/01/2010 08:13:53 PM 426 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 05/01/2010 02:31:45 AM 434 Views
How to explain... - 05/01/2010 03:43:03 AM 427 Views
If it feels good, that is all that matters! *NM* - 04/01/2010 08:29:32 PM 230 Views
The study consisted of basically asking women whether they had one? - 04/01/2010 08:48:43 PM 485 Views
That's what I thought also. *NM* - 04/01/2010 10:21:42 PM 160 Views
Re: This. *NM* - 04/01/2010 10:53:20 PM 154 Views
exactly. *NM* - 05/01/2010 03:52:21 PM 161 Views
what's the difference... - 04/01/2010 11:41:29 PM 465 Views
Ahaha! Ahahaha! Ahahahahaha . . . wait a minute . . . fail - 05/01/2010 03:58:32 PM 437 Views
<sarcasm> well why look for something that doesn't exist? - 05/01/2010 05:28:43 PM 400 Views
This sounds like the best experiment EVER. *NM* - 05/01/2010 01:26:05 AM 210 Views
read moar closely - 05/01/2010 02:28:25 AM 466 Views
I know, I read it. - 05/01/2010 12:29:18 PM 395 Views
Lord, PLEASE tell me my tax dollars didn't fund this!! *NM* - 05/01/2010 04:02:41 PM 198 Views
Snoopcester's did, not ours *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:34:09 AM 153 Views
All this shows is that British women need to find better lovers. *NM* - 06/01/2010 06:56:27 AM 162 Views
The Grafferberg Area DOES exits. *NM* - 06/01/2010 09:04:30 PM 188 Views

Reply to Message