I think i see what you are talking about, thanks. *NM*
Blaine Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 07:05:04 AM
Also, your conception of 1950s marriage is fairly caricatured. Although the topic of your paper suggests you realize that, you should acknowledge it.
What do you think of this intro?
14/12/2009 06:14:51 AM
- 704 Views
I'm not a fan of the first two sentences.
14/12/2009 06:42:10 AM
- 478 Views
Well, i know for a fact that he doesn't opening with questions
14/12/2009 07:02:03 AM
- 588 Views
Sentence fragments are unacceptable in technical writing. You need to fix that.
14/12/2009 06:51:05 AM
- 482 Views
I think i see what you are talking about, thanks. *NM*
14/12/2009 07:05:04 AM
- 235 Views
I want to stick a wikipedia-style "who?" in there.
14/12/2009 10:53:02 AM
- 470 Views
That's actually how we're taught to write in American high schools...
14/12/2009 02:39:56 PM
- 459 Views
Part of my problem is that he hasn't told me what level this is for.
14/12/2009 03:04:40 PM
- 441 Views
Aye, but it's an intro.
15/12/2009 08:07:38 AM
- 414 Views
References should come at the first mention of whatever it is. *NM*
15/12/2009 08:42:27 AM
- 188 Views
It's simply an introduction, my citations and stuff come in a little later. *NM*
14/12/2009 08:49:15 PM
- 236 Views
I smell a strawman...
15/12/2009 02:25:36 AM
- 478 Views
well it was in response to a prompt which stated people call it the "Golden Age". My hands were tied *NM*
15/12/2009 02:20:54 PM
- 215 Views
Stylistically it needs a lot of work.
15/12/2009 03:28:24 AM
- 519 Views
Hell, with a critique like that I may start putting up my introductory paragraphs.
*NM*
15/12/2009 04:37:53 AM
- 255 Views
