Active Users:982 Time:13/11/2024 06:33:28 AM
They pretty much have. Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM
I think a country has right to reasonable restrictions to protect their native culture. Form some of the reaction I have seen online you would think they had banned Muslim all together. Sorry but the idea that this is some sort of gross violation of human rights and sign of Switzerland slide into intolerance is simply silly hyperbola.

Edit: Sweden Switzerland same difference;)


There are exactly four minarets in the entirety of Switzerland, and it's not like there were plans to build tons more of them, either. This is nothing more or less than a declaration of mistrust in the Swiss Muslims. A violation of human rights it is not, but a sign of intolerance, absolutely.
Reply to message
It seems the Swiss ban on muslim minarets has passed rather quietly - 02/12/2009 04:15:22 PM 520 Views
This is surprising. - 02/12/2009 04:19:03 PM 269 Views
Not here, it certainly hasn't. - 02/12/2009 04:34:55 PM 283 Views
Nor here. It's all over our news. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:01:57 PM 119 Views
I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 05:54:11 PM 276 Views
Re: I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 06:23:09 PM 261 Views
I understand the first in Qatar was built in 2003. - 02/12/2009 10:11:31 PM 240 Views
Yes, with no steeple and no bell! - 03/12/2009 12:48:12 AM 254 Views
Ah yes, now that you mention it. - 03/12/2009 12:52:26 AM 242 Views
see here is what i dont get - 03/12/2009 05:21:10 AM 248 Views
I saw it posted elsewhere - 02/12/2009 06:09:33 PM 235 Views
Does anyone know the legal effect of this referendum? - 02/12/2009 10:00:54 PM 256 Views
It's Switzerland. Their referendums are binding. - 02/12/2009 10:07:52 PM 263 Views
Do the Swiss think they live in 5th-century BC Athens or something? - 02/12/2009 10:11:29 PM 258 Views
Switzerland is odd in a great many ways. - 02/12/2009 10:14:26 PM 261 Views
Actually, I think I meant the European Court of Human Rights, not the ECJ. - 02/12/2009 10:16:38 PM 260 Views
Yeah, but does that one have any power? - 02/12/2009 10:17:54 PM 276 Views
ECHR Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion - 02/12/2009 10:52:35 PM 308 Views
I feel like I'm missing something in this debate - 02/12/2009 11:21:03 PM 230 Views
The latter. - 02/12/2009 11:22:49 PM 271 Views
Huh, that's bizarre - 02/12/2009 11:39:03 PM 242 Views
It's coming from a party... - 02/12/2009 11:42:49 PM 296 Views
sicherheit schaffen, that's great! - 03/12/2009 12:00:00 AM 240 Views
I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 12:05:30 AM 263 Views
Re: I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 02:03:33 AM 245 Views
Thank you, I guess? - 03/12/2009 12:14:08 PM 249 Views
I don't really see a problem with it - 02/12/2009 10:09:55 PM 250 Views
They pretty much have. - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM 266 Views
that was kind of my thought - 03/12/2009 12:17:23 AM 229 Views
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM 265 Views
Several points... - 03/12/2009 07:15:17 PM 260 Views
The Adhan can really get to you - 02/12/2009 11:14:47 PM 311 Views
At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:24:03 PM 260 Views
Re: At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:41:20 PM 251 Views
just wanted to say high - 03/12/2009 03:37:45 PM 246 Views
I think it seems kind of a silly waste of government power... - 03/12/2009 12:27:29 AM 249 Views
It's not the government that did it. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:29:35 AM 120 Views
*re reads* Oh. I guess it's really power to the people over there - 03/12/2009 12:35:59 AM 226 Views
Unfortunately, sometimes... *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:15:29 PM 146 Views

Reply to Message