It will join the ranks of words such as karma, smorgasbord, shampoo, ketchup, samovar, and hurricane, which is another way of saying its meaning and/or pronunciation will be butchered out of all recognition and you will have problems proving it was ever from your language in the first place.
*plants the flag*
Anglophonia does not recognise the jurisdiction of anything, anywhere. This decision cannot be appealed in any way.
*plants the flag*
Anglophonia does not recognise the jurisdiction of anything, anywhere. This decision cannot be appealed in any way.
You forgot ombudsman. And husband.
On a side note. If you only knew what we do to your words. You would cry yourself to sleep every night. Oh yes. Hideous revenge.
Køntri. That is all I have to say.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Snirkle
- 26/11/2009 09:32:57 AM
643 Views
I know what you mean, let's see if there are any native speakers who know of an English word
- 26/11/2009 12:51:17 PM
637 Views
Are we sure that's a real word? (Snerk is another that sounds like what it means.)
- 26/11/2009 03:07:51 PM
362 Views
of course it is a real word. isn't it?
- 26/11/2009 04:53:04 PM
367 Views
We've kept the English spelling for "keitering"
- 26/11/2009 05:58:52 PM
545 Views
So have we, dammit.
- 26/11/2009 05:59:51 PM
358 Views
"Occasionally"?
- 26/11/2009 08:52:26 PM
348 Views
Re: "Occasionally"?
- 26/11/2009 09:09:20 PM
335 Views
What's "snerk" in Swedish? I bet it's really cute. 
*NM*
- 26/11/2009 08:53:50 PM
155 Views
*NM*
- 26/11/2009 08:53:50 PM
155 Views
I didn't have the slightest clue what that word meant
- 26/11/2009 09:29:30 PM
349 Views
So, in translation, you'll say "that icky stuff on the top of my cold soup"? *NM*
- 26/11/2009 10:02:42 PM
161 Views
Could be "twirly". . . some times. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 03:10:59 PM
148 Views
that was my thought too. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 09:14:23 PM
153 Views
Except it really doesn't work if you want to describe a person's movement. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 10:08:01 PM
159 Views
*muses* Whorl.
- 26/11/2009 05:20:34 PM
359 Views
whorl has more speed than snirkle *NM*
- 26/11/2009 05:49:07 PM
155 Views
Yes, snirkle has to end up just right. Think spending 10 minutes on one letter to get it right. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 06:00:42 PM
164 Views
You could alternately call it a "flourish", especially now that we've seized "snirkle". *NM*
- 26/11/2009 06:47:04 PM
139 Views
To flourish? Snirkle is a verb. And it is transitive! *NM*
- 26/11/2009 06:51:01 PM
129 Views
To flourish, yes. But in English, Snirkle will henceforth be a verb AND a noun.
- 26/11/2009 08:20:36 PM
357 Views
Re: To flourish, yes. But in English, Snirkle will henceforth be a verb AND a noun.
- 26/11/2009 09:10:06 PM
334 Views
Just say "snirkle" and pronounce it like we would - snerkl *NM*
- 26/11/2009 06:36:19 PM
150 Views
but then it looses its power. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 06:37:50 PM
137 Views
No it doesn't. There's even a candy called "Snirkles".
- 26/11/2009 06:40:15 PM
341 Views
Oooh. I want some of that.
- 26/11/2009 06:42:17 PM
334 Views
In the name of Anglophonia, I claim the word "snirkle" (pronounced "snerkl")
- 26/11/2009 06:46:17 PM
338 Views
But yours is a noun. Ours is a verb!
- 26/11/2009 06:49:47 PM
355 Views
I like "køntri". Suitably lame. *NM*
- 26/11/2009 08:58:16 PM
149 Views
Now that is an excellent point, although still not good enough to cancel out the horrible spelling *NM*
- 26/11/2009 09:30:53 PM
133 Views
Ours is a verb as well. I could also decide to make it an adjective.
- 26/11/2009 10:43:42 PM
336 Views
Re: Ours is a verb as well. I could also decide to make it an adjective.
- 27/11/2009 08:31:19 AM
319 Views
I'd say they were squiggles, and the cake was squiggly *NM*
- 26/11/2009 09:46:31 PM
144 Views
Also
- 27/11/2009 04:32:46 PM
337 Views
Re: Also
- 27/11/2009 04:38:48 PM
339 Views
Hazard? More like a given
- 27/11/2009 04:43:39 PM
388 Views
- 27/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
329 Views
- 27/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
329 Views
Om jag försökte att översätta det på finska, skulle jag sa "vääntelehtiä"
- 27/11/2009 07:17:24 PM
396 Views