You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
These people should be executed because of what they have done, not because of who they are. They plotted to kill thousands of Americans and then executed that plot. They were apprehended in the course of a war against their armed irregular group. To say they are entitled to "life and liberty" is patently absurd - the preamble to the Constitution has no legal force, and even if it did, it is obvious that its "protections" would not apply to enemies of the nation intent upon its destruction. Indeed, the one thing one isn't allowed to do is attempt to overthrow the government, yet this group seeks to do that, among other atrocities.
You're absolutely right, they should be executed because of what they've done (though I concede my magnanimity is slight in admitting a point that was mine.

In America, people have the right to a trial before we execute them; call me old fashioned, but I prefer it that way if only because I run my yap about as much online as that poor SOB we had the Syrians torture for a year because "we don't torture. " If we find them guilty their lives may well be forfeit, but convict them then execute them, don't just execute them.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
- 1130 Views
oO uhm, what?
20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
- 614 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
- 520 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
- 633 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
- 637 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
- 567 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country
20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 582 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
- 609 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
- 500 Views
Spare me the bullshit.
20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
- 500 Views
I will if you will.
20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
- 601 Views

No, you won't. You never will.
20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
- 492 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
- 583 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
- 544 Views
Allow me to point out...
20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
- 529 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
- 572 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
- 512 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one
21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
- 530 Views

Military struggles involve militaries.
20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
- 685 Views
Once again, bullshit.
20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
- 651 Views
This is wrong
20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
- 550 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
- 600 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
- 665 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative"
22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
- 651 Views
No you don't
22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
- 587 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
- 625 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want?
23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
- 545 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
- 599 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
- 735 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
- 493 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
- 628 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
- 495 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
- 515 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
- 746 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship.
23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
- 642 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
- 560 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
- 570 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
- 589 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
- 485 Views
And I've responded to yours
24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
- 567 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
- 550 Views
Good analysis of the situation.
23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
- 660 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
- 608 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
- 527 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists
23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
- 620 Views

They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
- 745 Views