Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
beckstcw Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
Raise your hand if you didn't see that one coming.
So we've got two possibilities: either the Obama Administration realized this would happen and decided to press ahead in order to indirectly put the Bush administration on trial (as well as the CIA, FBI, and the military) while still at war, or they legitimately didn't see it coming, thought everything would be sunshine and rainbows, and thus proving themselves only slightly less competent than a gang of brain damaged toddlers. Either way, I'm not too impressed, and I doubt the radical Islamists will be either.
So we've got two possibilities: either the Obama Administration realized this would happen and decided to press ahead in order to indirectly put the Bush administration on trial (as well as the CIA, FBI, and the military) while still at war, or they legitimately didn't see it coming, thought everything would be sunshine and rainbows, and thus proving themselves only slightly less competent than a gang of brain damaged toddlers. Either way, I'm not too impressed, and I doubt the radical Islamists will be either.
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden?
- 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM
1061 Views
oO uhm, what?
- 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM
544 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process.
- 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM
457 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started.
- 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM
571 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession.
- 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM
567 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial
- 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM
495 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country
- 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM
518 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it.
- 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM
542 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended.
- 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM
433 Views
Spare me the bullshit.
- 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM
438 Views
I will if you will. 
- 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
534 Views
- 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM
534 Views
No, you won't. You never will.
- 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM
425 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem.
- 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM
516 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow.
- 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM
475 Views
Allow me to point out...
- 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM
454 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group
- 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM
496 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance.
- 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM
440 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one 
- 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
455 Views
- 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM
455 Views
Military struggles involve militaries.
- 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM
617 Views
Once again, bullshit.
- 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM
580 Views
This is wrong
- 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM
484 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli.
- 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM
536 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad...
- 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM
603 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative"
- 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM
583 Views
No you don't
- 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM
519 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights?
- 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM
560 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want?
- 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM
453 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
- 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM
526 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court:
- 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM
661 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life.
- 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM
422 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life.
- 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
558 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles?
- 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM
419 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality.
- 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM
450 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy
- 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM
676 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship.
- 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
578 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America.
- 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM
500 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. "
- 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM
500 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years...
- 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM
523 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here
- 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM
419 Views
And I've responded to yours
- 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM
496 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate
- 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM
475 Views
Good analysis of the situation.
- 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM
589 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy.
- 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM
543 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists.
- 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM
463 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists 
- 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
558 Views
- 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM
558 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists.
- 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM
674 Views