Active Users:932 Time:15/11/2024 08:24:40 AM
Supposedly you can feed a starving child for a month on $10 (US. ) Joel Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 07:23:05 AM
Or so claimed James Robison yesterday morning (apparently Feed the Childrens donations line has gotten shorter than the line for those in need of aid. ) I don't know enough about that ministry or the issue to vouch for those claims, but yes, it certainly does put things in perspective. I do recall that recent Time photopiece on family food expenditures around the world had a family of eight in... Chad, I think... living on just over $60/month. A ticket to SB XLIII starts at $1819; mid-field goes for as much as $7500. Just something to consider.... ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Costs - 18/11/2009 09:48:12 AM 552 Views
Those numbers are pretty stunning *NM* - 18/11/2009 10:37:42 AM 133 Views
There are some pretty impressive numbers in there. *NM* - 18/11/2009 10:58:18 AM 133 Views
It's that damn mission to mars that keeps our books in the red. *NM* - 18/11/2009 12:33:52 PM 140 Views
My lands, those are some mighty awesome numbers. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:38:11 PM 135 Views
That is an awful-looking chart. *NM* - 18/11/2009 06:09:32 PM 136 Views
I think that may have been the idea. *NM* - 18/11/2009 06:10:39 PM 151 Views
I mean awful, in regards to design, not subject matter. *NM* - 18/11/2009 06:15:10 PM 138 Views
As Palatine says it's poorly designed. It's also inaccurate and misleading. *NM* - 18/11/2009 08:10:07 PM 129 Views
Piffle *NM* - 18/11/2009 08:15:19 PM 135 Views
What a great word. *NM* - 18/11/2009 08:23:49 PM 140 Views
Then you should love "poppycock" *NM* - 18/11/2009 09:14:01 PM 148 Views
Meh. I prefer piffle. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:02:04 PM 133 Views
Hogwash? - 18/11/2009 11:14:52 PM 330 Views
Supposedly you can feed a starving child for a month on $10 (US. ) - 20/11/2009 07:23:05 AM 354 Views

Reply to Message