Active Users:811 Time:18/12/2024 07:44:34 PM
<3 for your hypocricy. You hate the NYT but somehow use it as your link <3 <3 <3 *NM* The Shrike Send a noteboard - 03/11/2009 05:34:36 PM
.....grants and straight-up cash in the pocket. And I thought only skeptics of AGW were making a buck. Nothing wrong with making a buck, but it is time to realize that both sides come to the table with certain motivations:

November 3, 2009
Gore’s Dual Role: Advocate and Investor
By JOHN M. BRODER

WASHINGTON — Former Vice President Al Gore thought he had spotted a winner last year when a small California firm sought financing for an energy-saving technology from the venture capital firm where Mr. Gore is a partner.

The company, Silver Spring Networks, produces hardware and software to make the electricity grid more efficient. It came to Mr. Gore’s firm, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, one of Silicon Valley’s top venture capital providers, looking for $75 million to expand its partnerships with utilities seeking to install millions of so-called smart meters in homes and businesses.

Mr. Gore and his partners decided to back the company, and in gratitude Silver Spring retained him and John Doerr, another Kleiner Perkins partner, as unpaid corporate advisers.

The deal appeared to pay off in a big way last week, when the Energy Department announced $3.4 billion in smart grid grants. Of the total, more than $560 million went to utilities with which Silver Spring has contracts. Kleiner Perkins and its partners, including Mr. Gore, could recoup their investment many times over in coming years.

Silver Spring Networks is a foot soldier in the global green energy revolution Mr. Gore hopes to lead. Few people have been as vocal about the urgency of global warming and the need to reinvent the way the world produces and consumes energy. And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if and when it comes.

Critics, mostly on the political right and among global warming skeptics, say Mr. Gore is poised to become the world’s first “carbon billionaire,” profiteering from government policies he supports that would direct billions of dollars to the business ventures he has invested in.

Representative Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, asserted at a hearing this year that Mr. Gore stood to benefit personally from the energy and climate policies he was urging Congress to adopt.
Reply to message
Even for AGW supporters, it's all about the other "green"..... - 03/11/2009 04:09:37 PM 612 Views
Wait... Where is the problem? I'm lost as to what is wrong here. - 03/11/2009 04:32:47 PM 302 Views
profits are fine when it it a private money - 03/11/2009 06:33:01 PM 306 Views
Re: profits are fine when it it a private money - 04/11/2009 10:33:28 PM 262 Views
yeah... I'm with callandor. Are you saying that they're corrupt in some way? - 03/11/2009 04:44:10 PM 299 Views
Corrupt no, but biased and motivated to make sure the AGW "crisis" endures..... - 03/11/2009 04:50:48 PM 281 Views
I don't really believe in Global Warming. - 03/11/2009 04:59:26 PM 282 Views
agreement *NM* - 03/11/2009 05:10:04 PM 120 Views
Hi Celia! I talked to your man the other night. - 03/11/2009 05:14:51 PM 277 Views
You both are idiots. - 03/11/2009 05:35:57 PM 287 Views
Charming as ever..... *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:20:37 AM 121 Views
. *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:45:42 AM 114 Views
Re: You both are idiots. - 05/11/2009 06:22:00 PM 278 Views
why do you think we have only one source of energy? - 03/11/2009 06:35:23 PM 266 Views
Man invests in company that does business the way he wants them to. - 03/11/2009 05:30:24 PM 274 Views
a pushes government to spend a lot of money and then pockets a huge amount of it. Details at 9 *NM* - 03/11/2009 06:36:56 PM 116 Views
That's how lobbying works, yes... *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:49:44 AM 126 Views
You endorse lobbying for personal gain? - 04/11/2009 03:34:02 AM 277 Views
No. But I don't think he's lobbying for personal gain. - 04/11/2009 03:43:08 AM 277 Views
If his motives are so pure, then he shouldn't be in charge of his investments. - 04/11/2009 03:49:50 AM 262 Views
What makes you think I particularly care about Al Gore? - 04/11/2009 07:59:56 PM 258 Views
Isn't he the same guy who uses ten times as much energy as his neighbors - 04/11/2009 06:16:14 PM 278 Views
Maybe he is. - 04/11/2009 08:03:53 PM 271 Views
The only thing I reason I have a problem is it is public money - 05/11/2009 07:22:12 PM 282 Views
<3 for your hypocricy. You hate the NYT but somehow use it as your link <3 <3 <3 *NM* - 03/11/2009 05:34:36 PM 106 Views
I don't see a problem here - 03/11/2009 06:29:46 PM 273 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 04/11/2009 12:49:48 AM 113 Views
Sounds more like you're protesting efficiency ... *NM* - 04/11/2009 03:18:07 AM 116 Views
Change your words to "Cheney" and "Halliburton" if you want to see them all switch their replies. - 04/11/2009 03:29:32 AM 294 Views
Cheney didn't endorse petrochemical ideals before he was part of Halliburton, to my knowledge. - 04/11/2009 03:44:33 AM 276 Views
Of course you don't. - 04/11/2009 03:51:56 AM 271 Views
Never fear, Ghavrel. I agree with you. - 04/11/2009 01:41:00 PM 296 Views
And I. - 04/11/2009 02:14:07 PM 284 Views
If we must - 04/11/2009 02:53:04 PM 276 Views
See your noteboard. - 04/11/2009 04:59:20 PM 297 Views
to you knowledge did he oppose them? - 04/11/2009 06:19:16 PM 292 Views
You're not wrong at all. - 04/11/2009 07:56:25 PM 280 Views
Re: You're not wrong at all. - 05/11/2009 07:33:08 PM 287 Views
If my assumption seems highly reasonable? Then no, that's about right. - 06/11/2009 01:24:48 AM 260 Views
Cheney supported oil exploration before he ran Halliburton *NM* - 07/11/2009 06:39:33 AM 126 Views
Cool. Then his investment in that company isn't a problem. - 08/11/2009 01:00:14 AM 256 Views
Cheney was Vice-President. - 04/11/2009 02:44:55 PM 274 Views
Of course it isn't the exact same thing, but few analogies are. - 04/11/2009 05:16:34 PM 288 Views
It's a very different thing, even. - 04/11/2009 06:11:15 PM 259 Views
I don't believe anyone is saying he shouldn't be allowed to do it - 05/11/2009 07:41:14 PM 269 Views
And you choose to ignore my entire post, or what? - 05/11/2009 09:41:21 PM 245 Views
The Nobel committee seems to be rather found of him - 06/11/2009 04:43:10 PM 266 Views
Capitalist invests in companies who work towards the same cause as he does? Shocking. - 04/11/2009 03:12:52 PM 253 Views
Well - 04/11/2009 05:18:50 PM 273 Views
The US is a communist country. - 05/11/2009 09:59:16 PM 258 Views

Reply to Message