The view of history is not monolithic. You are entitled to your views.
The Shrike Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 04:36:45 PM
Mormonism may not seem "odder or less odd" than Scientology to you, but it differs in key ways that I mentioned earlier. It has stories, myths, beliefs that draw on the power of traditional Christian beliefs and may add to them in unusual ways, but it still presents an emotionally powerful worldview. Scientologists tell no compelling tales and have an emotionally weak religion. The only interest has been from some unbalanced actors and people interested in participating in a tax dodge.
Perhaps you are correct. Perhaps because it is so secretive we don't yet know if they do or do not have such stories. But the cult itself is still in its infancy. Perhaps it will die like the cult of Isis did. Perhaps it will grow. Perhaps persecution will create stories for it. You see differences. Valid differences. I see potential and parallels. A potential for it to go either way depending on how future circumstances play out. If history is to be a guide, then it will fail. More cults have failed than have turned into legitimatized religions. I would be happy if it failed.
Defections, court fights test Scientology
01/11/2009 11:08:00 PM
- 702 Views
I don't think most people think the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses are "mainstream".
02/11/2009 12:29:51 AM
- 361 Views
I agree. When I read that I thought "bullshit". Especially about the JW's. *NM*
02/11/2009 04:40:05 AM
- 132 Views
Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
02/11/2009 12:40:26 AM
- 388 Views
Yes, literalism and fundamentalism don't typically make a lot of sense. *NM*
02/11/2009 01:34:48 AM
- 128 Views
I beg to differ. Scientology is more ridiculous than the other religions mentioned.
02/11/2009 01:58:44 AM
- 433 Views
To you, perhaps. To me it's a wonderful fantasy like the rest. No more or less believable.
02/11/2009 02:19:17 AM
- 361 Views
What sources do you have for that statement?
02/11/2009 06:38:19 AM
- 335 Views
The point was about polytheism versus monotheism
02/11/2009 03:29:23 PM
- 304 Views
I take issue with your view of history
02/11/2009 04:25:24 PM
- 330 Views
The view of history is not monolithic. You are entitled to your views.
02/11/2009 04:36:45 PM
- 322 Views
Excellent post.....all religions are a little nutty, but Christianity was a natural extension to....
02/11/2009 02:43:49 AM
- 325 Views
Re: Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
02/11/2009 04:03:49 AM
- 374 Views
Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
02/11/2009 06:34:16 AM
- 348 Views
Re: Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
02/11/2009 02:42:22 PM
- 353 Views
Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
02/11/2009 03:23:25 PM
- 343 Views
+1 to your question and add "abysmal grammar and style" *NM*
02/11/2009 04:28:08 PM
- 136 Views
Re: Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
03/11/2009 02:26:07 AM
- 329 Views
I think that you are wrong.
02/11/2009 03:48:20 PM
- 348 Views
Define, supporting/promoting a war?
02/11/2009 04:12:46 PM
- 347 Views
Agreed, and even some 19th century wars had at least partial religious motivations. *NM*
02/11/2009 05:38:22 PM
- 138 Views
Uh? I thought what was testing Scientology was its crazy-ass beliefs..... *NM*
02/11/2009 02:38:07 AM
- 147 Views