Active Users:2573 Time:22/01/2025 10:44:21 PM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 859 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 228 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 223 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 195 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 201 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 444 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 220 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 178 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 549 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 206 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 194 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 536 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 520 Views

Reply to Message