Active Users:409 Time:24/02/2025 06:29:36 AM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 886 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 236 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 234 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 202 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 214 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 472 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 230 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 187 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 579 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 216 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 208 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 565 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 544 Views

Reply to Message