Active Users:1108 Time:14/11/2024 10:39:18 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM
Or are you referring to something else in the 1976 Convention?


There's that, and the adoption of a prayer book with ambiguous and unorthodox theology. But the attempt to "ordain" women was a serious breach that effectively cut them off from the Catholic Church. Since that time the liberals have redefined Christianity to fit their own un-Christian ideals.

And I would say that, positively, the Seven Ecumenical Councils + adherence to Holy Tradition = Catholicism.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Catholic Church reaccepting Anglicans allowing Anglicans to remain Anglicans in most things but name Roland00 - 25/10/2009 11:15:50 PM 999 Views
Ratzinger has to try something to offset the liberals in Catholicism. Why not appeal to... everynametaken - 26/10/2009 02:17:36 AM 642 Views
As you noted in your post, it's nothing new. And it's not likely to lead to much. Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 03:35:18 AM 662 Views
I don't know about that, some have already left the communion, and you may have a schism Roland00 - 26/10/2009 04:27:01 AM 618 Views
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM 587 Views
definitly agree about the episcoplians LadyLorraine - 26/10/2009 01:14:53 PM 620 Views
Wouldn't you say not believing in transubstantiation is an important theological difference? Tim - 26/10/2009 08:39:00 AM 588 Views
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference Roland00 - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM 639 Views
Re: To the common man no, it isn't a major difference Handel - 26/10/2009 04:55:51 PM 892 Views
I was going to mention that... Tom - 26/10/2009 01:08:09 PM 608 Views
It should be noted Handel - 26/10/2009 05:02:23 PM 602 Views
Catholicism = no ordination of women? Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 06:31:44 PM 618 Views
Re: Catholicism = no ordination of women? Handel - 26/10/2009 07:40:45 PM 695 Views
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM 624 Views
I prefer Anglican Catholic Handel - 26/10/2009 11:41:12 PM 618 Views
what about the congregations that have a woman priest? imlad - 27/10/2009 03:56:45 PM 738 Views
Re: what about the congregations that have a woman priest? Handel - 27/10/2009 04:37:16 PM 624 Views
Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, everynametaken - 27/10/2009 10:31:02 PM 619 Views
Re: Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, Handel - 28/10/2009 01:26:24 AM 666 Views
So in sum your response is tradition Roland00 - 28/10/2009 02:50:06 AM 623 Views
Not tradition, but Tradition (capital) Handel - 28/10/2009 04:15:40 PM 841 Views
Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male Roland00 - 28/10/2009 10:22:28 PM 726 Views
Re: Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male Handel - 29/10/2009 09:02:36 PM 824 Views
Hun I am a former catholic Roland00 - 29/10/2009 09:33:45 PM 607 Views
I am a former protestant Handel - 30/10/2009 12:12:57 AM 810 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes