Active Users:1120 Time:22/11/2024 01:20:33 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference Roland00 Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM
Here are some more stories on this (how do I post multiple hyperlinks now with the change to RAFO?)


As at wotmania, you don't.

What's the source for the article you posted? Or did you write it? (I assume you didn't, but only because you wrote it in italics)

To the common man no, it isn't a major difference. They still do the ritual of celebrating the Eucharist. The only difference is that they say this is literally the body/blood of christ.

And Anglicans aren't for or against Transubstantiation, they just don't have an official church policy on it. Some people believe in Transubstantiation, some don't.

----

As for your other question, I wrote everything in italics. That is my personal opinion. I normally write my personal stuff in italics and the normal article in non italics. Of course though I didn't write the 5 articles I then posted the links for.
This message last edited by Roland00 on 26/10/2009 at 12:12:25 PM
Reply to message
Catholic Church reaccepting Anglicans allowing Anglicans to remain Anglicans in most things but name Roland00 - 25/10/2009 11:15:50 PM 1003 Views
Ratzinger has to try something to offset the liberals in Catholicism. Why not appeal to... everynametaken - 26/10/2009 02:17:36 AM 646 Views
As you noted in your post, it's nothing new. And it's not likely to lead to much. Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 03:35:18 AM 667 Views
I don't know about that, some have already left the communion, and you may have a schism Roland00 - 26/10/2009 04:27:01 AM 622 Views
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM 591 Views
definitly agree about the episcoplians LadyLorraine - 26/10/2009 01:14:53 PM 623 Views
Wouldn't you say not believing in transubstantiation is an important theological difference? Tim - 26/10/2009 08:39:00 AM 592 Views
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference Roland00 - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM 643 Views
Re: To the common man no, it isn't a major difference Handel - 26/10/2009 04:55:51 PM 895 Views
I was going to mention that... Tom - 26/10/2009 01:08:09 PM 612 Views
It should be noted Handel - 26/10/2009 05:02:23 PM 606 Views
Catholicism = no ordination of women? Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 06:31:44 PM 624 Views
Re: Catholicism = no ordination of women? Handel - 26/10/2009 07:40:45 PM 698 Views
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? Ghavrel - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM 628 Views
I prefer Anglican Catholic Handel - 26/10/2009 11:41:12 PM 623 Views
what about the congregations that have a woman priest? imlad - 27/10/2009 03:56:45 PM 743 Views
Re: what about the congregations that have a woman priest? Handel - 27/10/2009 04:37:16 PM 628 Views
Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, everynametaken - 27/10/2009 10:31:02 PM 624 Views
Re: Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, Handel - 28/10/2009 01:26:24 AM 670 Views
So in sum your response is tradition Roland00 - 28/10/2009 02:50:06 AM 625 Views
Not tradition, but Tradition (capital) Handel - 28/10/2009 04:15:40 PM 844 Views
Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male Roland00 - 28/10/2009 10:22:28 PM 730 Views
Re: Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male Handel - 29/10/2009 09:02:36 PM 825 Views
Hun I am a former catholic Roland00 - 29/10/2009 09:33:45 PM 613 Views
I am a former protestant Handel - 30/10/2009 12:12:57 AM 814 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes