Active Users:734 Time:28/12/2025 08:07:52 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
maybe? *NM* temeraire Send a noteboard - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM
He said something I found very interesting. I wanted to see what some of you guys thought about it.

He argued that the prize being given was not really intended for Obama himself. He said he saw it as being given to the American voters through Obama for changing the direction of the most powerful nation on Earth. The rest of the world was so relieved, in his opinion, that they saw the election of Obama as an enormous step toward peace.

What do you think? Is he full of crap? Or might this hold some truth?
"it's like the real world, except there's dragons!"

cw, you are missed...
Reply to message
So, I was discussing Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize with a friend and... Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 05:01:38 PM 850 Views
I don't think so. He's trying to rationalise. *NM* AgentOrange - 12/10/2009 05:03:46 PM 220 Views
I think this was actually the Nobel Committee's rationale, wasn't it? beetnemesis - 12/10/2009 05:06:12 PM 565 Views
No. Ouranid - 12/10/2009 06:26:47 PM 602 Views
Has some truth I think, yeah. *NM* Legolas - 12/10/2009 05:09:18 PM 222 Views
wait. Obama won the peace prize? *NM* jh - 12/10/2009 05:18:12 PM 213 Views
He got it for bombing the moon. *NM* Jragghen - 12/10/2009 06:14:10 PM 230 Views
I heard it was hiding WMDs. *NM* Craig - 12/10/2009 08:18:19 PM 228 Views
Well, it wouldn't allow the UN inspectors in so what would you think? *NM* Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 08:34:11 PM 240 Views
maybe? *NM* temeraire - 12/10/2009 05:20:38 PM 245 Views
I think your friend is right in part random thoughts - 12/10/2009 05:32:19 PM 614 Views
From a CNN article: Aemon - 12/10/2009 05:57:22 PM 583 Views
Re: From a CNN article: Mats Gambling Buddy - 12/10/2009 07:11:19 PM 569 Views
Mmmmnah Camilla - 12/10/2009 06:11:15 PM 624 Views
And that my second reaction *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 09:01:45 PM 228 Views
His was actually my first reaction too *NM* ironclad - 12/10/2009 08:15:20 PM 231 Views
No one currently fighting two wars should win. Ever. *NM* Joker - 12/10/2009 08:17:47 PM 238 Views
I can't really agree nossy - 12/10/2009 09:04:54 PM 578 Views
No, I don't buy it. *NM* everynametaken - 13/10/2009 02:51:54 AM 210 Views
Obama was probably the best available choice Sidious - 13/10/2009 05:26:26 AM 600 Views
and you would give it to Obama for? *NM* random thoughts - 13/10/2009 03:58:22 PM 212 Views
Do you have a source for that? Sareitha Sedai - 13/10/2009 04:03:47 PM 548 Views
Re: Do you have a source for that? Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:25:14 AM 689 Views
Ah. I thought you had info on the short list. Sareitha Sedai - 14/10/2009 02:53:53 PM 553 Views
There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Legolas - 13/10/2009 04:21:55 PM 550 Views
Re: There's always organizations that have been doing good work for decades. Sidious - 14/10/2009 07:23:54 AM 580 Views
If it was "given to the American voters," the I want my share of the prize money. Palatine - 13/10/2009 04:01:12 PM 587 Views
He promises change.... Mats imaginary friend - 14/10/2009 05:51:07 AM 636 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes