After 60-90 minutes, there really is a difference, I've noticed
Larry Send a noteboard - 02/05/2017 12:23:16 AM
View original post
I enjoyed running and wish I had stayed with it when I got out but it killed my knees. Not sure how much of a difference there between five miles and 10K but 3 to 5 really want that different. Just takes longer.
I enjoyed running and wish I had stayed with it when I got out but it killed my knees. Not sure how much of a difference there between five miles and 10K but 3 to 5 really want that different. Just takes longer.
I bring along gels and chews for those runs, along with a handheld bottle filled with an endurance drink like Tailwind or Liquid IV. Otherwise, I'd "bonk" by 7-8 miles due to loss of electrolytes and carbs.
10K is 6.21 miles, so only 2K more, more or less. 21.1K is roughly a half marathon in metric terms.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
/Survey: Distance Running
29/04/2017 02:35:34 AM
- 1140 Views
I'm not a distance runner. I never did more than 5 miles at once.
29/04/2017 05:35:34 PM
- 707 Views
I never have but I'm thinking of starting
30/04/2017 05:16:18 AM
- 732 Views
A man of your maturity may want to consider swimming or biking.....
30/04/2017 07:34:02 PM
- 645 Views
And I've seen several in their 60s and 70s running 3-6 miles (some faster than me)
30/04/2017 07:59:03 PM
- 947 Views
Bah
30/04/2017 08:31:11 PM
- 655 Views
There is a difference between keeping running as you age and starting when your old
01/05/2017 07:49:07 PM
- 791 Views
I ... do not do this.
30/04/2017 07:51:34 PM
- 792 Views
But...but...it's fun!
30/04/2017 08:00:29 PM
- 942 Views
Eight years in the USMC I ran ask lot of 3-5 miles but nothing longer
01/05/2017 07:45:38 PM
- 827 Views
After 60-90 minutes, there really is a difference, I've noticed
02/05/2017 12:23:16 AM
- 1012 Views