Active Users:1129 Time:22/11/2024 04:17:04 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM

They were being threatened with boycotts. That is all they cared about. We don't get this same level of reaction and that's of boycotts when it is Liberal being accused. Hell the a academy awards have a Oscar to a child rapist and the people defending him were not boycotted. The offended are more motivated by the offender than the offense.

The question isn't what the motivation of the companies was but what was the motivation of those threatening them is. Maybe I am a cynic but I see no reason to believe their motivation was derived more from their disgust and his mostly unknown offenses and a wealth of reasons to think it wad his views and their attitude about his network. If I am right about their motivation, and we know I'm not, then it is censorship plain and simple. It doesn't even matter if he is guilty, it certainly doesn't matter to those threatening boycotts.

This message last edited by random thoughts on 21/04/2017 at 05:49:52 PM
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack damookster - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 835 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... Anonymous2000 - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 590 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal random thoughts - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 621 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 Roland00 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 618 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved damookster - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 561 Views
My guess is 2 Tom - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 533 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved Roland00 - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 586 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship random thoughts - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 548 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. The Shrike - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 550 Views
Horse shit random thoughts - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 636 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! The Shrike - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 545 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? The Shrike - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 531 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other random thoughts - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 631 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* The Shrike - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 350 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship Roland00 - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 541 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? damookster - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 581 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do Tom - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 511 Views
Regarding corporate policy damookster - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 627 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation Tom - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 499 Views
The company isn't stupid damookster - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 563 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 595 Views
Your points are pointless random thoughts - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 661 Views
We are debating different things damookster - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 533 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 570 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject Roland00 - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 480 Views
I agree with you damookster - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 523 Views
So??/ random thoughts - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 580 Views
You want a world that is objective, that people do not make decisions and opinions based off Roland00 - 21/04/2017 04:55:08 PM 572 Views
Nope just want you to admit that this is about who he is more than what he did but I know you can't *NM* random thoughts - 21/04/2017 05:55:51 PM 340 Views
I told you my meaning and what motivates me Roland00 - 21/04/2017 07:54:05 PM 523 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* Ghavrel - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 235 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" Tom - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 499 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books damookster - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 566 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? random thoughts - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 539 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? The Shrike - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 530 Views
Agreed damookster - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 547 Views
It did have that vibe Jeordam - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 552 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. HyogaRott - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 522 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes