Yeah. They seem so wound up about Trump that they forget how brutal the 2018 Senate map is.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 28/03/2017 09:58:50 PM
View original postEven if it would change the balance they have no grounds stopping the nomination. They were idiots for being the first to use the nuclear option. Living in echo chambers they just can't accept that they really only have power in a few large states and are not likely to control the senate anytime soon.
Best case scenario, even if the 2018 elections are a resounding success, seems to be limiting damage in the Senate, potentially shifting the House and winning enough in the states that they can limit the gerrymandering damage in 2020. Actually controlling the Senate - maybe if they win the 2020 presidential election, but that would require nominating a candidate who can win, and I'm not so sure about that, looking at it now.
Gorsuch's Supreme Court nomination
- 27/03/2017 08:03:23 PM
767 Views
We in the US are headed towards a British Parliamentary system it seems.
- 27/03/2017 08:29:17 PM
676 Views
That's certainly what Britain looks like at the moment - it doesn't always though
- 27/03/2017 09:10:24 PM
488 Views
Personally I prefer Gorsuch to Garland. And I've read the Constitution.
- 28/03/2017 06:02:03 PM
452 Views
they are mad that the republicans won't give into to their but hurt
- 28/03/2017 02:06:51 PM
472 Views
Yeah. They seem so wound up about Trump that they forget how brutal the 2018 Senate map is.
- 28/03/2017 09:58:50 PM
479 Views
Two wrongs do not make a right (even if three lefts do)
- 28/03/2017 07:40:33 PM
802 Views
It's indeed amazing that we're all on the same page so far, including you. 
- 28/03/2017 09:54:40 PM
470 Views
- 28/03/2017 09:54:40 PM
470 Views
We'll have to go nuclear.
- 28/03/2017 09:09:17 PM
493 Views
KABOOM - As per McConnell, Gorsuch will be confirmed on Friday, April 7th
- 29/03/2017 02:18:50 AM
593 Views
UPDATE - Looks like the Dems will force the Reps to use the "Harry Reid Rule"
- 03/04/2017 03:42:14 AM
498 Views