Active Users:1094 Time:22/11/2024 08:19:47 AM
That isn't what it means at all. LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM

It means that you can choose to buy a plan that meets what you're looking for. Such as, Massachusetts has a shit ton of things that have to be included in a policy: pediatric dentistry, fertility treatments, etc. I think Mass has like 50 mandates of things that an insurance company must cover. Fuck that. I want to shop for a plan that only covers what I feel like having covered and am willing to pay for. But, the dear lknow-it-alls who run this state want to force everyone to have the same coverage.

If you could buy a plan from say Ohio that was just basic and covered what you wanted covered, it'd cost a lost less. Clearly someone isn't going to select a plan that restricts them to providers in another state. You'd probably see an out-of-state company work with an in-state company to access its network for a fee, at least until they could establish their own provider network. But it'd still be a lot cheaper than having everyone pay for a gold-plated policy that they don't necessarily want but have to buy if they want insurance. And in Mass, you have to buy or you get penalized.

"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 790 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 546 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 265 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 304 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 551 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 545 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 453 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 490 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 556 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 509 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 647 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 686 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 563 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 500 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 528 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 473 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 593 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 565 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 504 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 570 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 509 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 515 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 537 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 521 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 535 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 524 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 517 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 558 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 564 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 310 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 520 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 538 Views

Reply to Message